Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/114th Congress · Senate

S. 483

Became law

Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2016

Sponsor
Not on file
Introduced
February 12, 2015
Policy area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Latest action
Became Public Law No: 114-145.April 19, 2016

Plain-language analysis

AI analysis · 85% confidence

AI-generated breakdown of the bill’s full text (below), checked by an independent review pass before publishing. It is analysis, not the law itself — the verbatim text and official source are the record.

In plain terms

S. 483 changes how the federal government licenses and disciplines the doctors, pharmacies, manufacturers, and distributors that are legally allowed to handle controlled substances such as opioid painkillers. Its central provision writes a definition into law for "imminent danger to the public health or safety" — the standard the DEA must meet to suspend a license immediately, before any hearing — requiring the government to show that drugs will keep being distributed by a registrant who knows or should know that specified harms (dispensing outside normal medical practice, a risk of death or injury from abuse, or continued diversion) are occurring. It also guarantees that before the DEA moves to revoke or suspend a license through the ordinary process, the registrant receives written notice citing the specific legal provisions at issue, at least 30 days before having to appear, and a chance to submit a corrective action plan that the DEA must consider. Finally, it directs the Department of Health and Human Services, through the FDA and CDC, to report to four congressional committees within a year on obstacles to legitimate patient access to these medicines, on drug diversion, and on how law enforcement and the pharmaceutical industry can collaborate, drawing on input from ten listed stakeholder groups including patients, pharmacies, manufacturers, insurers, and wholesale distributors.

Hidden provisions

Withheld — not yet measured.

Questionable / off-intent provisions

Withheld — not yet measured.

Junk / unrelated provisions

Withheld — not yet measured.

Some findings above are withheld. StumpWatch publishes a flag only once we have measured how often that check is right against a labelled set of bills — an unmeasured finding is treated exactly like one that failed. Withheld does not mean the bill is clean on that point; it means we are not making a claim.

How we decide what to publish →
[114th Congress Public Law 145] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [[Page 353]] ENSURING PATIENT ACCESS AND EFFECTIVE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 2016 [[Page 130 STAT. 354]] Public Law 114-145 114th Congress An Act To improve enforcement efforts related to prescription drug diversion and abuse, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Apr. 19, 2016 - [S. 483]>> Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2016.>> SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 21 USC 801 note.>> SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2016''. SEC. 2. REGISTRATION PROCESS UNDER CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT. (a) Definitions.-- (1) Factors as may be relevant to and consistent with the public health and safety.--Section 303 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 823) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(j) In this section, the phrase `factors as may be relevant to and consistent with the public health and safety' means factors that are relevant to and consistent with the findings contained in section 101.''. (2) Imminent danger to the public health or safety.--Section 304(d) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 824(d)) is amended-- (A) by striking ``(d) The Attorney General'' and inserting ``(d)(1) The Attorney General''; and (B) by adding at the end the following: ``(2) In this subsection, the phrase `imminent danger to the public health or safety' means that, due to the failure of the registrant to maintain effective controls against diversion or otherwise comply with the obligations of a registrant under this title or title III, there is a substantial likelihood of an immediate threat that death, serious bodily harm, or abuse of a controlled substance will occur in the absence of an immediate suspension of the registration.''. (b) Opportunity To Submit Corrective Action Plan Prior to Revocation or Suspension.--Subsection (c) of section 304 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 824) is amended-- (1) by striking the last three sentences; (2) by striking ``(c) Before'' and inserting ``(c)(1) Before''; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(2) An order to show cause under paragraph (1) shall-- ``(A) contain a statement of the basis for the denial, revocation, or suspension, including specific citations to any laws [[Page 130 STAT. 355]] or regulations alleged to be violated by the applicant or registrant; ``(B) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> direct the applicant or registrant to appear before the Attorney General at a time and place stated in the order, but not less than 30 days after the date of receipt of the order; and ``(C) <<NOTE: Notification.>> notify the applicant or registrant of the opportunity to submit a corrective action plan on or before the date of appearance. ``(3) <<NOTE: Determination.>> Upon review of any corrective action plan submitted by an applicant or registrant pursuant to paragraph (2), the Attorney General shall determine whether denial, revocation, or suspension proceedings should be discontinued, or deferred for the purposes of modification, amendment, or clarification to such plan. ``(4) Proceedings to deny, revoke, or suspend shall be conducted pursuant to this section in accordance with subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code. Such proceedings shall be independent of, and not in lieu of, criminal prosecutions or other proceedings under this title or any other law of the United States. ``(5) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply to the issuance of an immediate suspension order under subsection (d).''. SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS. (a) <<NOTE: Coordination. Consultation.>> In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, the Administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the Director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in coordination with the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration and in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall submit a report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate identifying-- (1) obstacles to legitimate patient access to controlled substances; (2) issues with diversion of controlled substances; (3) how collaboration between Federal, State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies and the pharmaceutical industry can benefit patients and prevent diversion and abuse of controlled substances; (4) the availability of medical education, training opportunities, and comprehensive clinical guidance for pain management and opioid prescribing, and any gaps that should be addressed; (5) beneficial enhancements to State prescription drug monitoring programs, including enhancements to require comprehensive prescriber input and to expand access to the programs for appropriate authorized users; and (6) steps to improve reporting requirements so that the public and Congress have more information regarding prescription opioids, such as the volume and formulation of prescription opioids prescribed annually, the dispensing of such prescription opioids, and outliers and trends within large data sets. [[Page 130 STAT. 356]] (b) Consultation.--The report under subsection (a) shall incorporate feedback and recommendations from the following: (1) Patient groups. (2) Pharmacies. (3) Drug manufacturers. (4) Common or contract carriers and warehousemen. (5) Hospitals, physicians, and other health care providers. (6) State attorneys general. (7) Federal, State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies. (8) Health insurance providers and entities that provide pharmacy benefit management services on behalf of a health insurance provider. (9) Wholesale drug distributors. (10) Veterinarians. (11) Professional medical societies and boards. (12) State and local public health authorities. (13) Health services research organizations. Approved April 19, 2016. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 483 (H.R. 471): --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114-85, Pt. 1 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce) accompanying H.R. 471. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): Mar. 17, considered and passed Senate. Apr. 12, considered and passed House. <all>

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →