Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/118th Congress · House

H.R. 3572

Introduced

Securities Clarity Act

Sponsor
RTom Emmer· Minnesota
Introduced
May 22, 2023
Policy area
Finance and Financial Sector
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.May 22, 2023
[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3572 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3572

To amend the securities laws to exclude investment contract assets from 
the definition of a security.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

May 22, 2023

Mr. Emmer (for himself and Mr. Soto) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend the securities laws to exclude investment contract assets from 
the definition of a security.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Securities Clarity Act''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS; PURPOSE.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) among the ways that participants in the digital asset 
industry have raised capital and earned revenue is through 
arrangements in which investors provide funds for the 
development of blockchain-based protocols in exchange for 
digital assets or the future delivery of digital assets to be 
used in those protocols;
(2) although certain of those fundraising arrangements may 
be deemed to be ``investment contracts'' within the meaning 
given to that term in section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 
1933 (the ``Securities Act''), the underlying assets sold 
pursuant to these arrangements are frequently not themselves 
inherently securities as defined in section 2(a) of the 
Securities Act and, like other assets sold pursuant to 
investment contracts in the past, do not become securities as 
so defined merely because they are sold pursuant to an 
investment contract;
(3) under SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946), and 
its progeny, the Federal courts have consistently held that 
``an investment contract, for purposes of the Securities Act, 
means a contract, transaction, or scheme whereby a person 
invests his money in a common enterprise and is led to expect 
profits solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third 
party'', and have not endorsed the notion that an asset 
underlying an investment contract (for example, the orange 
groves sold in Howey) is also conferred ``security'' status 
merely as a result of its being sold pursuant to the relevant 
contract, transaction, or scheme;
(4) although the distinction between an investment 
contract, which is a security, and the assets sold pursuant to 
it had been well-settled for purposes of section 2(a) of the 
Securities Act, the two have been unnecessarily conflated in 
the context of digital assets; and
(5) this new approach, which conflates an investment 
contract and the asset sold pursuant to that contract or 
scheme, differs from the approach taken in many other major 
jurisdictions around the world, has discouraged development of 
the digital asset sector in the United States, and has hindered 
innovation in that industry here without providing concomitant 
benefits to those who enter into investment contracts for the 
purpose of acquiring digital assets.
(b) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to clarify and codify that 
an asset sold pursuant to an investment contract, whether tangible or 
intangible (including an asset in digital form), that is not otherwise 
a security under the Act, does not become a security as a result of 
being sold or otherwise transferred pursuant to an investment contract.

SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF INVESTMENT CONTRACT ASSETS.

(a) Securities Act of 1933.--Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 
1933 (15 U.S.C. 77b(a)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following: 
``The term `security' does not include an investment contract 
asset.''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(20) The term `investment contract asset' means an asset, 
whether tangible or intangible, including assets in digital 
form--
``(A) sold or otherwise transferred, or intended to 
be sold or otherwise transferred, pursuant to an 
investment contract; and
``(B) that is not otherwise a security pursuant to 
the first sentence of paragraph (1).''.
(b) Investment Advisers Act of 1940.--Section 202(a)(18) of the 
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-2(a)(18)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``The term `security' does not include 
an investment contract asset (as such term is defined under section 
2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933).''.
(c) Investment Company Act of 1940.--Section 2(a)(36) of the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(36)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``The term `security' does not include 
an investment contract asset (as such term is defined under section 
2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933).''.
(d) Securities Exchange Act of 1934.--Section 3(a)(10) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(10)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``The term `security' does not include 
an investment contract asset (as such term is defined under section 
2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933).''.
(e) Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970.--Section 16(14) of 
the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78lll(14)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following: ``The term `security' does 
not include an investment contract asset (as such term is defined under 
section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933).''.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →