Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/118th Congress · House

H.R. 9466

Introduced

AI Development Practices Act of 2024

Sponsor
RJames R. Baird· Indiana
Introduced
September 6, 2024
Policy area
Science, Technology, Communications
Latest action
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.September 11, 2024
[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9466 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 9466

To direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology to catalog 
and evaluate emerging practices and norms for communicating certain 
characteristics of artificial intelligence systems, including relating 
to transparency, robustness, resilience, security, safety, and 
usability, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 6, 2024

Mr. Baird (for himself and Mr. Lieu) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology to catalog 
and evaluate emerging practices and norms for communicating certain 
characteristics of artificial intelligence systems, including relating 
to transparency, robustness, resilience, security, safety, and 
usability, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``AI Development Practices Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. NIST RESEARCH ON DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES.

Section 22A of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 
Act (15 U.S.C. 278h-1) is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new 
subsection:
``(h) Assessment of the Practices of Artificial Intelligence 
Development.--
``(1) In general.--The Director of the National Institute 
of Standards and Technology (in this subsection referred to as 
the `Director') shall, subject to the availability of 
appropriations, develop, and periodically update, in 
collaboration with other public and private sector 
organizations, voluntary guidance for practices and guidelines 
relating to the development, release, and assessment of 
artificial intelligence systems. Such guidelines shall satisfy 
the following:
``(A) Define methods and guidelines for developing 
reasonable risk tolerances for various use cases of 
artificial intelligence systems based on the following:
``(i) The risks associated with the 
intended and unintended applications, use 
cases, and outcomes of the artificial 
intelligence system at issue, based on the 
guidelines specified in the voluntary risk 
management framework for trustworthy artificial 
intelligence systems, or successor framework, 
authorized under subsection (c), which may 
include different categories of risk, such as 
the following:
``(I) Security risks, including 
threats to national security.
``(II) Economic risks, including 
threats to economic opportunities.
``(III) Social risks, including 
infringement upon constitutional 
rights, privileges, or liberties.
``(ii) Such other factors as the Director 
determines appropriate and consistent with this 
subsection.
``(B) Categorize and list practices and norms for 
communicating relevant characteristics, including 
robustness, resilience, security, safety, fairness, 
privacy, validation, reliability, accountability, and 
usability, of artificial intelligence systems, and 
including any characteristics identified by the 
voluntary risk management framework for trustworthy 
artificial intelligence systems, or successor 
framework, authorized under subsection (c). Such 
practices and norms may relate to the following:
``(i) Documentation of training and 
evaluation datasets, such as information and 
statistics about a dataset's size, curation, 
annotation, and sources, and the protocols for 
a dataset's selection, creators, provenance, 
processing, augmentation, filters, inclusion of 
personally identifiable information, and 
intellectual property usage.
``(ii) Documentation of model information, 
such as a model's development stages, training 
objectives, training strategies, inference 
objectives, capabilities, reproducibility of 
capabilities, input and output modalities, 
components, size, and architecture.
``(iii) Evaluation of benchmarks for multi-
metric assessments, such as an assessment of an 
appropriate combination of robustness, 
resilience, security, safety, fairness, 
privacy, accuracy, validity, reliability, 
accountability, usability, transparency, 
efficiency, and calibration, and any 
characteristics identified by the voluntary 
risk management framework for trustworthy 
artificial intelligence systems, or successor 
framework, authorized under subsection (c).
``(iv) Metrics and methodologies for 
evaluations of artificial intelligence systems, 
such as establishing evaluation datasets.
``(v) Public reporting of artificial 
intelligence systems' capabilities, 
limitations, and possible areas of appropriate 
and inappropriate use.
``(vi) Disclosure of security practices, 
such as artificial intelligence red teaming and 
third-party assessments, that were used in the 
development of an artificial intelligence 
system.
``(vii) How to release to the public 
components of an artificial intelligence system 
or information about an artificial intelligence 
system, including aspects of the model, 
associated training data, and license 
agreements.
``(viii) Approaches and channels for 
collaboration and knowledge-sharing of best 
practices across industry, governments, civil 
society, and academia.
``(ix) Such other categories as the 
Director determines appropriate and consistent 
with this subsection.
``(C) For each practice and norm categorized and 
listed in accordance with subparagraph (B), provide 
recommendations and practices for utilizing such 
practice or norm.
``(2) Implementation.--In conducting the Director's duties 
under paragraph (1), the Director shall carry out the 
following:
``(A) Update the voluntary risk management 
framework for trustworthy artificial intelligence 
systems, or successor framework, authorized under 
subsection (c) as the Director determines appropriate.
``(B) Ensure that voluntary guidance developed in 
paragraph (1) is based on international standards and 
industry best practices to the extent possible and 
practical.
``(C) Not prescribe or otherwise require the use of 
specific information or communications technology 
products or services.
``(D) Collaborate with public, industry, and 
academic entities as the Director determines 
appropriate, including conducting periodic outreach to 
receive public input from public, industry, and 
academic stakeholders.
``(3) Report.--In conducting the Director's duties under 
paragraph (1), the Director shall, not later than 18 months 
after the date of the enactment of this subsection, brief the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation of the Senate on the following:
``(A) New or updated materials, programs, or 
systems that were produced as a result of carrying out 
this subsection.
``(B) Policy recommendations of the Director that 
could facilitate and improve communication and 
coordination between the private sector and relevant 
Federal agencies regarding implementing the recommended 
practices identified in this subsection.
``(4) Definitions.--In this subsection:
``(A) Artificial intelligence red teaming.--The 
term `artificial intelligence red teaming' means a 
structured testing of adversarial efforts to find flaws 
and vulnerabilities in an artificial intelligence 
system and identify risks, flaws, and vulnerabilities 
of artificial intelligence systems, such as harmful 
outputs from such system, unforeseen or undesirable 
system behaviors, limitations, and potential risks 
associated with the misuse of such system.
``(B) Artificial intelligence system.--The term 
`artificial intelligence system' has the meaning given 
such term in section 7223 of the Advancing American AI 
Act (40 U.S.C. 11301 note; as enacted as part of title 
LXXII of division G of the James M. Inhofe National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023; Public 
Law 117-263).''.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →