Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/118th Congress · House

H.R. 9868

Introduced

Effective Death Penalty Appeals Act

Sponsor
DHenry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr.· Georgia
Introduced
September 27, 2024
Policy area
Law
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.September 27, 2024

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text below and the official source are the record.

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 9868 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 9868 To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the availability of Federal habeas corpus relief for a person who is sentenced to death though actually innocent. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES September 27, 2024 Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Ms. Pingree, and Ms. Norton) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify the availability of Federal habeas corpus relief for a person who is sentenced to death though actually innocent. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Effective Death Penalty Appeals Act''. SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF THE AVAILABILITY OF FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF FOR A PERSON WHO IS SENTENCED TO DEATH THOUGH ACTUALLY INNOCENT. Section 2254(d) of title 28, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``; or'' and inserting a semicolon; (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and inserting ``; or''; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(3) resulted in, or left in force, a sentence of death that was imposed without consideration of newly discovered evidence which, in combination with the evidence presented at trial, demonstrates that the applicant is probably not guilty of the underlying offense.''. SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF THE AVAILABILITY OF AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Section 2254(e)(2)(A) of title 28, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in clause (i), by striking ``or'' at the end; (2) in clause (ii) by striking ``and'' at the end and inserting ``or''; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(iii) in the case of an applicant sentenced to death, such failure was the result of ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel in a State that prohibits an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal; and''. SEC. 4. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS RELATING TO SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE PETITIONS. (a) State Convictions.--Section 2244(b) of title 28, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``A'' and inserting ``Except as provided in paragraph (5), a''; and (2) by adding at the end the following: ``(5) A claim that an applicant was sentenced to death without consideration of newly discovered evidence which, in combination with the evidence presented at trial, could reasonably be expected to demonstrate that the applicant is probably not guilty of the underlying offense may be presented in a second or successive habeas corpus application.''. (b) Federal Convictions.--Section 2255(h) of title 28, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``or''; (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (2) and inserting ``; or''; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(3) a claim that an applicant was sentenced to death without consideration of newly discovered evidence which, in combination with the evidence presented at trial, could reasonably be expected to demonstrate that the applicant is probably not guilty of the underlying offense.''. <all>

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →