Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 3095

Introduced

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate single, unique ZIP Codes for certain communities, and for other purposes.

Sponsor
RLauren Boebert· Colorado
Introduced
April 30, 2025
Policy area
Government Operations and Politics
Latest action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.July 22, 2025
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3095 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3095

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

July 22, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

AN ACT

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate single, unique 
ZIP Codes for certain communities, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODES FOR CERTAIN COMMUNITIES.

Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, unique 
ZIP Code for each of the following communities:
(1) Canyon Lake, California.
(2) Hidden Hills, California.
(3) Industry, California.
(4) North Tustin, California.
(5) Tehachapi, California.
(6) Castle Pines, Colorado.
(7) Centennial, Colorado.
(8) Cherry Hills Village, Colorado.
(9) Greenwood Village, Colorado.
(10) Highlands Ranch, Colorado.
(11) Keystone, Colorado.
(12) Lone Tree, Colorado.
(13) Mountain Village, Colorado.
(14) Mt. Crested Butte, Colorado.
(15) Severance, Colorado.
(16) Silver Cliff, Colorado.
(17) Sterling Ranch, Colorado.
(18) Superior, Colorado.
(19) Telluride, Colorado.
(20) Oakland Park, Florida.
(21) Lighthouse Point, Florida.
(22) Coconut Creek, Florida.
(23) Parkland, Florida.
(24) Deerfield Beach, Florida.
(25) Wilton Manors, Florida.
(26) Burr Ridge, Illinois.
(27) Carmel, Indiana.
(28) Noblesville, Indiana.
(29) Westfield, Indiana.
(30) Zionsville, Indiana.
(31) Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
(32) Montz, Louisiana.
(33) Springwater Township, Minnesota.
(34) Grass Valley, Nevada.
(35) Swanzey, New Hampshire.
(36) Kinnelon, New Jersey.
(37) Flanders, New York.
(38) Glendale, New York.
(39) Riverside, New York.
(40) Pendleton, New York.
(41) Weddington, North Carolina.
(42) Goose Creek, South Carolina.
(43) Fairview, Texas.
(44) Fate, Texas.
(45) Heath, Texas.
(46) Murphy, Texas.
(47) Northlake, Texas.
(48) Parker, Texas.
(49) Sargent, Texas.
(50) Fairlawn, Virginia.
(51) Caledonia, Wisconsin.
(52) Franklin, Wisconsin.
(53) Glendale, Wisconsin.
(54) Greenfield, Wisconsin.
(55) Village of Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin.
(56) Village of Somers, Wisconsin.
(57) Village of Harrison, Wisconsin.
(58) Hochatown, Oklahoma.
(59) Green, Ohio.
(60) Rochester, Wisconsin.
(61) Quartzite Township, Minnesota.
(62) Frederick, Colorado.
(63) Camargo, Kentucky.
(64) Wheatfield, New York.
(65) Mauldin, South Carolina.
(66) Josephine, Texas.

Passed the House of Representatives July 21, 2025.

Attest:

KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

Clerk.

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →