Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 4207

Introduced

No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act

Sponsor
RThomas P. Tiffany· Wisconsin
Introduced
June 26, 2025
Policy area
International Affairs
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.June 26, 2025
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4207 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 4207

To require any convention, agreement, or other international instrument 
on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response reached by the World 
Health Assembly to be subject to Senate ratification.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 26, 2025

Mr. Tiffany (for himself, Mr. Wied, Mr. Moolenaar, Ms. Hageman, Mr. 
Norman, Mr. Cloud, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Crane, Mr. Stauber, 
and Mr. Gosar) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To require any convention, agreement, or other international instrument 
on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response reached by the World 
Health Assembly to be subject to Senate ratification.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty 
Without Senate Approval Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:
(1) On May 18, 2020, President Donald Trump sent a letter 
to World Health Organization (referred to in this Act as 
``WHO'') Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (referred 
to in this Act as the ``Director-General''), announcing that--
(A) United States contributions to WHO would be 
halted due its mismanagement of the COVID-19 outbreak 
and its lack of independence from the People's Republic 
of China; and
(B) the United States would withdraw from WHO if it 
did not commit to substantive improvements within 30 
days.
(2) President Trump's May 18 letter cited numerous 
instances of WHO mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic, 
including--
(A) unjustified delays informing member states 
about a potentially serious disease outbreak in Wuhan, 
China; and
(B) repeated grossly inaccurate or misleading 
claims about the transmissibility of the virus and 
about the Government of China's handling of the 
outbreak.
(3) On June 30, 2020, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo 
formally notified the United Nations of the United States 
decision to withdraw from WHO, which would have taken effect on 
July 6, 2021, under the terms of a joint resolution adopted by 
Congress on June 14, 1948 (Public Law 80-643; 62 Stat. 441).
(4) A Pew Research Center survey conducted in April and May 
2020 indicated that 51 percent of Americans felt that WHO had 
done a poor or fair job in managing the COVID-19 pandemic.
(5) On January 20, 2021, President Joseph Biden sent United 
Nations Director-General Antonio Guterres a letter retracting 
the United States notice of withdrawal from WHO.
(6) On December 1, 2021, at the second special session of 
the World Health Assembly (referred to in this Act as the 
``WHA'') decided--
(A) to establish an intergovernmental negotiating 
body (referred to in this section as the ``INB'') to 
draft and negotiate a WHO convention (referred to in 
this section as the ``Convention''), agreement, or 
other international instrument on pandemic prevention, 
preparedness, and response, with a view to adoption 
under Article 19 or any other provision of the WHO 
Constitution; and
(B) that the INB shall submit a progress report to 
the Seventy-sixth WHA and a working draft of the 
convention for consideration by the Seventy-seventh 
WHA.
(7) On February 24, March 14 and 15, and June 6 through 8 
and 15 through 17, 2022, the INB held its inaugural meeting at 
which the Director-General proposed the following 5 themes to 
guide the INB's work in drafting the Convention:
(A) Building national, regional, and global 
capacities based on a whole-of-government and whole-of-
society approach.
(B) Establishing global access and benefit sharing 
for all pathogens, and determining a global policy for 
the equitable production and distribution of 
countermeasures.
(C) Establishing robust systems and tools for 
pandemic preparedness and response.
(D) Establishing a long-term plan for sustainable 
financing to ensure support for global health threat 
management and response systems.
(E) Empowering WHO to fulfill its mandate as the 
directing and coordinating authority on international 
health work, including for pandemic preparedness and 
response.
(8) The INB failed to negotiate an agreement on Convention 
text and did not present a final draft of the Convention during 
the Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly held between May 27 
and June 1, 2024.
(9) On June 1, 2024, the World Health Assembly extended the 
INB's Convention mandate until the Seventy-eighth World Health 
Assembly in 2025.
(10) On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump revoked 
President Joseph Biden's January 25, 2021, retraction of the 
United States notification of withdrawal from the WHO.
(11) On May 20, 2025, during the 78th World Health 
Assembly, WHO member states adopted the INB's draft of a WHO 
Pandemic Agreement.
(12) Section 723.3 of title 11 of the Department of State's 
Foreign Affairs Manual states that when ``determining whether 
any international agreement should be brought into force as a 
treaty or as an international agreement other than a treaty, 
the utmost care is to be exercised to avoid any invasion or 
compromise of the constitutional powers of the President, the 
Senate, and the Congress as a whole'' and includes the 
following criteria to be considered when determining whether an 
international agreement should take the form of a treaty or an 
executive agreement:
(A) ``The extent to which the agreement involves 
commitments or risks affecting the nation as a whole''.
(B) ``Whether the agreement is intended to affect 
state laws''.
(C) ``Whether the agreement can be given effect 
without the enactment of subsequent legislation by the 
Congress''.
(D) ``Past U.S. practice as to similar 
agreements''.
(E) ``The preference of the Congress as to a 
particular type of agreement''.
(F) ``The degree of formality desired for an 
agreement''.
(G) ``The proposed duration of the agreement, the 
need for prompt conclusion of an agreement, and the 
desirability of concluding a routine or short-term 
agreement''.
(H) ``The general international practice as to 
similar agreements''.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) a significant segment of the American public is deeply 
skeptical of the World Health Organization, its leadership, and 
its independence from the pernicious political influence of 
certain member states, including the People's Republic of 
China;
(2) Congress strongly prefers that any agreement related to 
pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response adopted by the 
World Health Assembly pursuant to the work of the INB be 
considered a treaty requiring the advice and consent of the 
Senate, with two-thirds of Senators concurring;
(3) the scope of the agreement which the INB has been 
tasked with drafting, as outlined by the Director-General, is 
so broad that any application of the factors referred to in 
section 2(11) will weigh strongly in favor of it being 
considered a treaty; and
(4) given the level of public distrust, any relevant new 
agreement by the World Health Assembly which cannot garner the 
two-thirds vote needed for Senate approval should not be agreed 
to or implemented by the United States.

SEC. 4. ANY WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY CONVENTION OR AGREEMENT OR OTHER 
INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENT RESULTING FROM THE INTERNATIONAL 
NEGOTIATING BODY'S FINAL REPORT DEEMED TO BE A TREATY 
SUBJECT TO ADVICE AND CONSENT OF THE SENATE.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any convention, 
agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, 
preparedness, and response reached by the World Health Assembly 
pursuant to the recommendations, report, or work of the International 
Negotiating Body established by the second special session of the World 
Health Assembly is deemed to be a treaty that is subject to the 
requirements of article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of 
the United States, which requires the advice and consent of the Senate, 
with two-thirds of Senators concurring.

SEC. 5. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

It is the policy of the United States to unequivocally support 
Taiwan's full participation in the World Health Organization.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →