Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 4481

Introduced

ARMS Act

Sponsor
RRobert B. Aderholt· Alabama
Introduced
July 17, 2025
Policy area
International Affairs
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.July 17, 2025

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text below and the official source are the record.

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 4481 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4481 To amend the Arms Export Control Act to modify the authorities relating to the Special Defense Acquisition Fund. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 17, 2025 Mr. Aderholt (for himself, Mr. Moskowitz, Mr. Panetta, and Mr. Zinke) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Arms Export Control Act to modify the authorities relating to the Special Defense Acquisition Fund. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Accelerate Revenue for Manufacturing and Sales Act'' or the ``ARMS Act''. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) The United States defense industrial base plays a critical role in advancing both security and prosperity. (2) There is increasing global demand for United States manufactured defense capabilities, highlighting the need to maintain a strong, agile, and scalable defense production capacity. (3) In recent years, the combined value of Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) has significantly exceeded domestic defense procurement budgets, with international demand for United States defense products approaching two-to-one over domestic acquisition. (4) Delays in delivering defense articles to allied and partner nations expose vulnerabilities in the current acquisition and sales process that risks undermining United States strategic credibility abroad. (5) The Special Defense Acquisition Fund (SDAF) has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing delivery times and enabling advanced contracting for high-demand defense items prior to the completion of formal agreements. (6) Strengthening and expanding the SDAF would increase the efficiency and predictability of defense article deliveries to foreign partners, support the United States defense industrial base, and improve economies of scale. (7) Timely access to United States defense systems by allies and partners strengthens interoperability, improves coalition readiness, deters shared threats, and reinforces long-standing strategic relationships. (8) Enhancing SDAF authorities and capacity aligns with United States national interests and supports continued leadership in the global defense market. SEC. 3. MODIFICATIONS TO SPECIAL DEFENSE ACQUISITION FUND. Section 51(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2795(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``sales made under'' and all that follows through ``the actual value'' and inserting ``sales''. <all>

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →