Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 4481

Introduced

ARMS Act

Sponsor
RRobert B. Aderholt· Alabama
Introduced
July 17, 2025
Policy area
International Affairs
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.July 17, 2025
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4481 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 4481

To amend the Arms Export Control Act to modify the authorities relating 
to the Special Defense Acquisition Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 17, 2025

Mr. Aderholt (for himself, Mr. Moskowitz, Mr. Panetta, and Mr. Zinke) 
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend the Arms Export Control Act to modify the authorities relating 
to the Special Defense Acquisition Fund.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Accelerate Revenue for Manufacturing 
and Sales Act'' or the ``ARMS Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) The United States defense industrial base plays a 
critical role in advancing both security and prosperity.
(2) There is increasing global demand for United States 
manufactured defense capabilities, highlighting the need to 
maintain a strong, agile, and scalable defense production 
capacity.
(3) In recent years, the combined value of Foreign Military 
Sales (FMS) and Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) has significantly 
exceeded domestic defense procurement budgets, with 
international demand for United States defense products 
approaching two-to-one over domestic acquisition.
(4) Delays in delivering defense articles to allied and 
partner nations expose vulnerabilities in the current 
acquisition and sales process that risks undermining United 
States strategic credibility abroad.
(5) The Special Defense Acquisition Fund (SDAF) has 
demonstrated effectiveness in reducing delivery times and 
enabling advanced contracting for high-demand defense items 
prior to the completion of formal agreements.
(6) Strengthening and expanding the SDAF would increase the 
efficiency and predictability of defense article deliveries to 
foreign partners, support the United States defense industrial 
base, and improve economies of scale.
(7) Timely access to United States defense systems by 
allies and partners strengthens interoperability, improves 
coalition readiness, deters shared threats, and reinforces 
long-standing strategic relationships.
(8) Enhancing SDAF authorities and capacity aligns with 
United States national interests and supports continued 
leadership in the global defense market.

SEC. 3. MODIFICATIONS TO SPECIAL DEFENSE ACQUISITION FUND.

Section 51(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2795(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``sales made under'' and all that 
follows through ``the actual value'' and inserting ``sales''.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →