Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 4676

Introduced

Modern Firearm Safety Act

Sponsor
RDarrell Issa· California
Introduced
July 23, 2025
Policy area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.July 23, 2025
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4676 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 4676

To prohibit the imposition of requirements that handguns have certain 
features generally absent from firearms in common use, and to restore 
the civil and natural rights of Americans in States hostile to liberty, 
and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 23, 2025

Mr. Issa (for himself, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Collins, Mr. Gooden, Mr. Biggs 
of Arizona, Mr. Fallon, Mr. Mills, and Mr. Fleischmann) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To prohibit the imposition of requirements that handguns have certain 
features generally absent from firearms in common use, and to restore 
the civil and natural rights of Americans in States hostile to liberty, 
and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Modern Firearm Safety Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds that State and local governmental requirements 
for handgun design that mandate features not ordinarily present on the 
affected models limit the selection of handguns available to law-
abiding citizens in these jurisdictions; artificially inflate the price 
of constitutionally protected arms; present safety concerns by altering 
the intended design and function of the affected models; violate the 
Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and pose an 
unacceptable restraint on interstate commerce. The purpose of this Act 
to is preempt any such requirements that exceed those imposed by 
Federal statute.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSITION OF REQUIREMENTS THAT HANDGUNS HAVE 
CERTAIN FEATURES GENERALLY ABSENT FROM FIREARMS IN COMMON 
USE.

(a) In General.--Section 927 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
(1) by striking ``No'' and inserting ``(a) In General.--
Except as provided in subsection (b), no''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(b) Prohibition on Imposition of Requirements That Handguns Have 
Certain Features Generally Absent From Firearms in Common Use.--A 
department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States, or of any 
State or political subdivision of a State, may not implement or enforce 
any provision of law or regulation that requires or has the effect of 
requiring, or promulgate any provision of regulation that would require 
or have the effect of requiring, a handgun that is in, or has been 
shipped or transported in, interstate or foreign commerce to 
incorporate any design feature, functionality, safety mechanism, or 
performance standard that is not required by Federal statute as a 
condition for the lawful manufacture, sale, or receipt of the handgun, 
including--
``(1) a device that indicates whether the handgun is 
loaded;
``(2) a mechanism that prevents a handgun from being fired 
if an ammunition magazine is not fully inserted into the 
handgun;
``(3) the capability of imprinting the cartridge casing or 
projectile of ammunition fired from the handgun with characters 
meant to identify the handgun from which the ammunition is 
fired;
``(4) any device, mechanism, or technology that--
``(A) is designed or intended to perform any 
function described in the preceding provisions of this 
section; or
``(B) may be readily converted to be capable of 
performing any such function; or
``(5) the capability of accepting the attachment of any 
device or mechanism described in paragraph (4).''.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →