Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 5268

Introduced

FAIR Trucking Act

Sponsor
RAshley Hinson· Iowa
Introduced
September 10, 2025
Policy area
Law
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.September 10, 2025
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5268 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 5268

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for Federal district 
court jurisdiction for highway accident actions against interstate 
motor carriers.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 10, 2025

Mrs. Hinson (for herself and Mr. Barrett) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for Federal district 
court jurisdiction for highway accident actions against interstate 
motor carriers.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Forum Accountability and Integrity 
in Roadway Trucking Act'' or the ``FAIR Trucking Act''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTION FOR HIGHWAY ACCIDENT 
ACTIONS AGAINST INTERSTATE MOTOR CARRIERS.

(a) Application of Federal Jurisdiction.--Section 1332 of title 28, 
United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
``(e)(1) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of 
any civil action--
``(A) alleging bodily harm or loss of life involving one or 
more commercial motor vehicles, as defined in section 31101 of 
title 49, operating on a public road in interstate commerce;
``(B) in which the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or 
value of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and
``(C) is a civil action in which--
``(i) any plaintiff is a citizen of a State 
different from any defendant;
``(ii) any plaintiff is a foreign state or a 
citizen or subject of a foreign state and any defendant 
is a citizen of a State; or
``(iii) any plaintiff is a citizen of a State and 
any defendant is a foreign state or a citizen or 
subject of a foreign state.
``(2) Citizenship of plaintiffs shall be determined for 
purposes of paragraph (1) as of the date of filing of the 
complaint or amended complaint, or, if the case stated by the 
initial pleading is not subject to Federal jurisdiction, as of 
the date of service by plaintiffs of an amended pleading, 
motion, or other paper, indicating the existence of Federal 
jurisdiction.
``(3) For purposes of this subsection, an unincorporated 
association shall be deemed to be a citizen of the State where 
it has its principal place of business and the State under 
whose laws it is organized.''.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →