Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 6532

Introduced

PATHS to Tutor Act of 2025

Sponsor
DSusie Lee· Nevada
Introduced
December 9, 2025
Policy area
Education
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.December 9, 2025
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6532 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 6532

To establish a grant program for innovative partnerships among teacher 
preparation programs, local educational agencies, and community-based 
organizations to expand access to high-quality tutoring in hard-to-
staff schools and high-need schools, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

December 9, 2025

Ms. Lee of Nevada (for herself and Mr. Valadao) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To establish a grant program for innovative partnerships among teacher 
preparation programs, local educational agencies, and community-based 
organizations to expand access to high-quality tutoring in hard-to-
staff schools and high-need schools, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Partnering Aspiring Teachers with 
High-need Schools to Tutor Act of 2025'' or the ``PATHS to Tutor Act of 
2025''.

SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM FOR HIGH-QUALITY TUTORING.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Educational service agency.--The term ``educational 
service agency'' has the meaning given the term in section 8101 
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 7801).
(2) Educator preparation program.--The term ``educator 
preparation program'' means a State-accredited program at a 
public or nonprofit institution of higher education or other 
nonprofit provider that prepares individuals to serve as 
educators.
(3) Hard-to-staff school.--The term ``hard-to-staff 
school'' means a high-need school that has a high rate of 
teacher turnover or a large concentration of teachers in their 
first or second year of teaching.
(4) High-need school.--The term ``high-need school'' has 
the meaning given the term in section 2211 of the Elementary 
and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6631).
(5) High-quality tutoring.--The term ``high-quality 
tutoring'' means tutoring--
(A) that is provided by a tutor;
(B) that is one-on-one or in a small group not to 
exceed a ratio of 1 tutor to 4 students, or a small 
group ratio based on evidence determined sufficient by 
the State educational agency in the State in which the 
tutoring takes place;
(C) that includes plans and time for tutors to 
collaborate;
(D) that--
(i) includes multiple sessions each week 
that are of sufficient length, such as the 
length of a regularly scheduled class or 
period; and
(ii) is--
(I) embedded in the school 
schedule, preferably during the regular 
school day or tightly integrated to the 
regular school day and provided before 
or after school; or
(II) during school vacations;
(E) in which content and grade-specific tutors are 
matched with students;
(F) that is aligned to local standards and 
curriculum;
(G) that includes high-quality pre-service training 
and ongoing professional support;
(H) that a local consortium facilitates by--
(i) the local educational agency and 
schools in the local consortium supporting 
tutors through direct supervision and feedback; 
and
(ii) the faculty or staff of the educator 
preparation program in the local consortium 
providing additional capacity; and
(I) where tutors are adequately compensated for 
their work.
(6) Local consortium.--The term ``local consortium'' means 
a consortium consisting of community partners as follows:
(A) The consortium shall include the following 
entities, one or both of which shall serve as the lead 
entity of the consortium:
(i) A local educational agency, an 
individual school, or an educational service 
agency.
(ii) An educator preparation program.
(B) The consortium may include a community partner, 
such as--
(i) a community-based organization;
(ii) a child- and youth-serving 
organization or agency;
(iii) an institution of higher education, 
as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a));
(iv) a foundation;
(v) an educator organization;
(vi) an organization representing education 
professionals;
(vii) a local government, including a 
government agency serving children and youth, 
such as a child welfare and juvenile justice 
agency;
(viii) an organization representing 
students; or
(ix) an organization representing parents.
(7) Local educational agency.--The term ``local educational 
agency'' has the meaning given the term in section 8101 of the 
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
7801).
(8) Mentor.--The term ``mentor'' means an experienced 
educator, including a teacher-educator at an educator 
preparation program, dedicated to advising a tutor or 
administering the tutoring program.
(9) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
of Education.
(10) Tutor.--The term ``tutor'' means--
(A) a postsecondary student, including one who is 
enrolled in an educator preparation program;
(B) a recent graduate of an educator preparation 
program;
(C) an individual serving as an education 
paraprofessional or teaching aide; or
(D) a fully certified and licensed educator (such 
as a recently retired educator, an educator 
experiencing a gap in employment due to COVID-induced 
budget cuts, or an educator providing tutoring before 
or after school or during the summer).
(b) Demonstration Competitive Grant Program.--The Secretary shall 
award grants, on a competitive basis, to local consortia to enable the 
local consortia to carry out high-quality tutoring, especially at hard-
to-staff schools or high-need schools.
(c) Application.--A local consortium that desires to receive a 
grant under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary 
at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information as 
the Secretary may require, including the following:
(1) A description of the local consortium, including which 
public or nonprofit entity participating in the local 
consortium shall serve as the fiscal agent for the local 
consortium.
(2) A description of the strategy for recruitment, careful 
selection, and matching of tutors with hard-to-staff schools 
and high-need schools.
(3) A description of the pre-service training and ongoing 
professional support for tutors.
(4) A list of hard-to-staff schools and high-need schools, 
and the grades that will be supported in each school, 
identified by the local consortium to receive a comprehensive, 
coordinated continuum of services and support.
(5) A description of how the high-quality tutoring program 
plans to accelerate student learning.
(6) A description of how the local consortium will ensure 
that the high-quality tutoring provided under such program does 
not result in the tracking or negative labeling of students, or 
remediation.
(7) A description of the duration of the high-quality 
tutoring, including the duration of sessions, the number of 
days a week tutoring will occur, and the length in weeks the 
tutoring will occur.
(8) An assurance that the local consortium will align high-
quality tutoring to the local curriculum and standards of the 
local educational agency and school and will be designed to 
support student success in the classroom.
(9) A description of materials and supports and how they 
are aligned with the local curriculum and standards of the 
local educational agency and school.
(10) A description of how the high-quality tutoring program 
will build school capacity in the schools in which the tutors 
will serve.
(11) An assurance that the local consortium will leverage 
tutors to supplement, not supplant, existing staff.
(12) A description of how tutors will be adequately 
compensated.
(13) An assurance that the local consortium will use funds 
to supplement and not supplant funds otherwise available to 
carry out high-quality tutoring and will not use any funds to 
replace teaching positions with tutoring positions.
(14) A description of how the tutoring program will 
incorporate research-based social-emotional learning practices, 
trauma-informed learning practices, and culturally and 
linguistically responsive practices.
(d) Priority.--In awarding grants under this section, the Secretary 
shall give priority to local consortia that plan to support high-need 
schools in building student learning capacity by using tutors who--
(1) are postsecondary students who are enrolled in educator 
preparation programs; or
(2) are enrolled in a historically Black college or 
university (defined as a part B institution under section 322 
of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1061)) or 
another minority-serving institution (defined as an eligible 
institution under section 371(a) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 
1067q(a))).
(e) Use of Funds.--A local consortium that receives a grant under 
this section may use the grant funds for the following:
(1) Matching, training, and placing tutors with schools to 
deliver high-quality tutoring.
(2) Supporting tutors to work with small groups of students 
attending high-need schools wherein tutors are providing 
supervision and instruction, and providing the tutors with time 
for collaboration with mentors.
(3) Matching tutors in the high-quality tutoring program 
with mentors.
(4) Providing stipends to such tutors and mentors.
(5) Purchasing instructional materials and connectivity 
resources, including internet access and accessible devices.
(6) Providing transportation for students attending the 
high-quality tutoring program.
(7) Providing meals and snacks for students attending the 
high-quality tutoring program.
(8) Providing facilities for conducting the high-quality 
tutoring program.
(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--
(1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
carry out this section $500,000,000.
(2) Allocation.--From the amounts appropriated to carry out 
this section--
(A) not less than 85 percent shall be used for 
directly supporting students, including providing 
stipends to tutors and mentors in the high-quality 
tutoring program, providing transportation, meals, and 
snacks, and purchasing instructional materials and 
connectivity resources for students; and
(B) not more than 15 percent shall be used for 
other uses in carrying out this section.

SEC. 3. COORDINATION WITH THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY 
SERVICE.

(a) Interagency Agreement.--The Secretary of Education shall enter 
into an interagency agreement with the Corporation for National and 
Community Service under section 121(b) of the National and Community 
Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12571(b)) under which the Corporation 
shall approve tutor positions under a program funded under section 2, 
as approved national service positions (as defined in section 101 of 
the National and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12511)). Such 
interagency agreement shall specify how a degree or certificate of 
completion for a term of service as a provider of high-quality tutoring 
will be submitted to the Corporation.
(b) Special Rule.--Notwithstanding section 148 of the National and 
Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12604), the Secretary and the 
Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation for National and Community 
Service shall develop a program under which national service 
educational awards may be disbursed to tutors upon completion of 
service under a program funded under section 2.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →