Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 6659

Introduced

Critical Minerals Trade Security Act

Sponsor
RTim Moore· North Carolina
Introduced
December 11, 2025
Policy area
Foreign Trade and International Finance
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.December 11, 2025
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6659 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 6659

To establish within the Office of the United States Trade 
Representative a Chief Critical Minerals Negotiator, and for other 
purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

December 11, 2025

Mr. Moore of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. McGuire, Mr. Barr, and 
Mr. Lawler) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To establish within the Office of the United States Trade 
Representative a Chief Critical Minerals Negotiator, and for other 
purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Critical Minerals Trade Security 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) Critical minerals, including rare earth elements, are 
essential for national security and economic resilience.
(2) Processed critical minerals and their derivative 
products are key building blocks of the defense industrial base 
of the United States and integral to applications such as jet 
engines, missile guidance systems, advanced computing, radar 
systems, advanced optics, and secure communications equipment.
(3) The United States remains heavily dependent on foreign 
sources of critical minerals which exposes the economy and 
defense sector to supply chain disruptions and economic 
coercion.
(4) Foreign producers of critical minerals have engaged in 
price manipulation, overcapacity, and arbitrary export 
restrictions, using their supply chain dominance as a tool for 
geopolitical and economic leverage over the United States.

SEC. 3. CHIEF CRITICAL MINERALS NEGOTIATOR.

Section 141 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171(b)) is amended 
as follows:
(1) In subsection (b)(2)--
(A) in the first sentence, by inserting ``one Chief 
Critical Minerals Negotiator,'' after ``one Chief 
Agricultural Negotiator,''; and
(B) by inserting ``the Chief Critical Minerals 
Negotiator,'' after ``the Chief Agricultural 
Negotiator,'' each place it appears.
(2) In subsection (c), by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
``(7) The principal functions of the Chief Critical Minerals 
Negotiator shall be to conduct trade negotiations regarding critical 
minerals, enforce trade agreements relating to United States critical 
minerals resources, take appropriate action to address the acts, 
policies, or practices of trade partners with respect to critical 
minerals, and lead the coordination of the Office's critical minerals 
policy in consultation with the following individuals:
``(A) The Secretary of State or his designee.
``(B) The Secretary of Energy or his designee.
``(C) The Secretary of the Interior or his designee.
``(D) Any other individual the United States Trade 
Representative determines appropriate.''.
(3) By adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(i) Annual Report by Chief Critical Minerals Negotiator.--
``(1) In general.--Not later than September 30, 2026, and 
annually thereafter, the Chief Critical Minerals Negotiator 
shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, and 
concurrently publish on a publicly available website of the 
United States Trade Representative, a report that--
``(A) describes in detail the results of a review 
with respect to the acts, policies, and practices 
relating to the trade in critical minerals in the 
preceding fiscal year of countries determined by such 
negotiator to--
``(i) have a significant trade relationship 
with the United States; or
``(ii) pose a risk to the supply chains of 
the United States; and
``(B) determines whether each such act, policy, or 
practice reviewed under subparagraph (A)--
``(i) creates a supply chain vulnerability 
which would be detrimental to the United States 
defense, energy, and critical infrastructure 
sectors; or
``(ii) violates, is inconsistent with, or 
otherwise denies the United States of a benefit 
under a bilateral or multilateral trade 
agreement with such identified country; and
``(C) provides an update for each plan previously 
submitted under paragraph (2).
``(2) Response to adverse actions.--Not later than 30 days 
after the submission of the report under paragraph (1), the 
Chief Critical Minerals Negotiator shall submit to the 
appropriate congressional committees a plan to respond to the 
findings of the report, including any action taken under title 
III of this Act, to each act, policy, or practice identified in 
such report that was determined under paragraph (1)(B) to 
violate, be inconsistent with, or otherwise deny to the United 
States a benefit under a bilateral or multilateral trade 
agreement with such identified country or create a supply chain 
vulnerability which would be detrimental to the United States 
defense, energy, and critical infrastructure sectors.
``(3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In 
this subsection, the term `appropriate congressional 
committees' means Committee on Ways and Means of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate.''.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →