Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 6762

Introduced

FEMA Administrative Reform Act

Sponsor
DDeborah K. Ross· North Carolina
Introduced
December 16, 2025
Policy area
Emergency Management
Latest action
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.February 2, 2026
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6762 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 6762

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from implementing any 
policy that would require the personal approval of the Secretary of any 
expenditure of the Federal Emergency Management Agency of $100,000 or 
more, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

December 16, 2025

Ms. Ross (for herself, Mrs. Foushee, Mr. Davis of North Carolina, and 
Ms. Adams) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from implementing any 
policy that would require the personal approval of the Secretary of any 
expenditure of the Federal Emergency Management Agency of $100,000 or 
more, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``FEMA Administrative Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. FEMA ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Homeland Security may not implement any policy that would require the 
personal approval of the Secretary of any expenditure of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency of more than $100,000 for disaster-related 
costs.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →