Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 6869

Introduced

To amend the Aamodt Litigation Settlement Act to modify a provision relating to the extension of certain dates for the completion of the Regional Water System, and for other purposes.

Sponsor
DTeresa Leger Fernandez· New Mexico
Introduced
December 18, 2025
Policy area
Native Americans
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.December 18, 2025
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6869 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 6869

To amend the Aamodt Litigation Settlement Act to modify a provision 
relating to the extension of certain dates for the completion of the 
Regional Water System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

December 18, 2025

Ms. Leger Fernandez introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend the Aamodt Litigation Settlement Act to modify a provision 
relating to the extension of certain dates for the completion of the 
Regional Water System, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AAMODT LITIGATION SETTLEMENT PROTECTION.

Section 623(g) of the Aamodt Litigation Settlement Act (Public Law 
111-291; 124 Stat. 3153) is amended--
(1) by striking ``The dates'' and inserting the following:
``(1) Conditions precedent; expiration date.--The dates''; 
and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(2) Determination of substantial completion.--The dates 
in subsection (e) may be extended if the Pueblos, the United 
States (acting through the Secretary), the State, the City, and 
the County agree that an extension is reasonably necessary.''.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →