Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 7171

Introduced

Fair Legal Access Grants Act

Sponsor
DJudy Chu· California
Introduced
January 21, 2026
Policy area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.January 21, 2026
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7171 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 7171

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
award grants for providing legal resources for petitioners seeking 
extreme risk protection orders, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 21, 2026

Ms. Chu (for herself, Mr. Goldman of New York, Ms. Norton, Mr. Lynch, 
Mr. Frost, Mr. Moskowitz, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mrs. McBath, and Ms. 
Schakowsky) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
award grants for providing legal resources for petitioners seeking 
extreme risk protection orders, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Legal Access Grants Act''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL RESOURCES FOR EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDER PETITIONERS.

Subpart I of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10151 et seq.) is amended--
(1) by redesignating section 509 as section 510; and
(2) by inserting after section 508 the following:

``SEC. 509. LEGAL RESOURCES FOR EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDER 
PETITIONERS.

``(a) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) Covered petitioner.--The term `covered petitioner' 
means an individual who is eligible to seek an extreme risk 
protection order from an applicable State or Tribal court.
``(2) Extreme risk protection order.--The term `extreme 
risk protection order' means a written order or warrant, issued 
by a State or Tribal court or signed by a magistrate or other 
comparable judicial officer, the primary purpose of which is to 
reduce the risk of firearm-related death or injury by--
``(A) prohibiting a named individual from owning, 
purchasing, possessing, receiving, or having under the 
custody or control of the individual a firearm; or
``(B) having a firearm removed or requiring the 
surrender of a firearm from a named individual.
``(3) Firearm.--The term `firearm' has the meaning given 
the term in section 921 of title 18, United States Code.
``(b) Authority.--
``(1) In general.--The Attorney General shall award grants 
to States, local governments, and Tribal Governments for the 
purpose of providing legal representation and resources to 
covered petitioners.
``(2) Use of funds.--A State, local government, or Tribal 
Government that receives a grant under paragraph (1) may use 
amounts from the grant to--
``(A) ensure covered petitioners have access to 
counsel and interpretation and translation services;
``(B) establish legal resources centers--
``(i) for publishing and distributing 
information and responding to inquiries 
relating to the extreme risk protection order 
legal process of the applicable State or Tribal 
Government; and
``(ii) that focus on expanding resources in 
multiple languages other than English;
``(C) hire personnel to--
``(i) process and represent covered 
petitioners, such as personnel in local 
district attorney offices and law enforcement 
agencies; or
``(ii) serve as legal resource 
coordinators;
``(D) award subgrants to nonprofit organizations 
that provide community legal aid; and
``(E) train legal service providers, law 
enforcement officers, prosecutors, court personnel, and 
other individuals on the differences between an extreme 
risk protection order and a domestic violence 
protection order to ensure that victims of domestic 
violence seek the form of protection order that best 
addresses their safety needs.
``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $50,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2028 through 2034.''.

SEC. 3. JURISDICTION OF FEDERAL COURTS.

(a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``covered petitioner'' 
has the meaning given the term in section 509(a) of the Omnibus Crime 
Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as added by section 2 of this 
Act.
(b) No Jurisdiction.--No Federal court may exercise jurisdiction 
over a Federal, State, Tribal, or local cause of action in response to 
a covered petitioner filing a petition for an extreme risk protection 
order if the covered petitioner did not file a false or intentionally 
harassing petition.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →