Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 7284

Introduced

ICE OUT Act

Sponsor
DDaniel S. Goldman· New York
Introduced
January 30, 2026
Policy area
Immigration
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.January 30, 2026
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7284 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 7284

To reform qualified immunity standards for officers and agents of U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement or U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection engaged in law enforcement activities, and for other 
purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 30, 2026

Mr. Goldman of New York (for himself and Mr. Swalwell) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To reform qualified immunity standards for officers and agents of U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement or U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection engaged in law enforcement activities, and for other 
purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``ICE OUT Act''.

SEC. 2. REFORMING QUALIFIED IMMUNITY STANDARDS FOR ICE AGENTS ENGAGED 
IN LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES.

Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``Every person'';
(2) by inserting ``of the United States or'' before ``of 
any State''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(b) In the case of any action brought under this section or any 
other Federal law against an officer or agent of U.S. Immigration and 
Customs Enforcement or U.S. Customs and Border Protection engaged in 
law enforcement--
``(1) no immunity defense shall be available if the facts 
alleged by the plaintiff would constitute excessive force in 
violation of the 4th amendment; and
``(2) in all other cases, an immunity defense shall only be 
available if the defendant acted in a manner consistent with 
rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution 
and laws clearly established at the time at which the conduct 
subject to the cause of action occurred.
``(c) In determining when immunity shall apply under subsection 
(b)(2), a court must first determine whether the facts alleged would 
constitute a violation of the rights, privileges, or immunities secured 
by the Constitution prior to determining whether any such rights were 
clearly established at the time at which the conduct subject to the 
cause of action occurred.''.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →