H.R. 7366
IntroducedDietary Supplement Regulatory Uniformity Act
Full text of the bill
Official source on Congress.gov ↗[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 7366 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7366 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to clarify and affirm the preemptive authority of the Food and Drug Administration over dietary supplement regulation, and for other purposes. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 4, 2026 Mr. Langworthy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to clarify and affirm the preemptive authority of the Food and Drug Administration over dietary supplement regulation, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Dietary Supplement Regulatory Uniformity Act''. SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF FEDERAL PREEMPTION WITH RESPECT TO DIETARY SUPPLEMENT REGULATION. Section 403A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 343-1) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(c)(1) No State (or political subdivision thereof) may establish or continue in effect any requirement concerning a dietary supplement which is different from, or in addition to, or that is not otherwise identical with, a requirement applicable to a dietary supplement under this Act. ``(2) Upon application of a State or a political subdivision thereof, the Secretary may, by regulation and after notice and opportunity for a hearing, exempt from paragraph (1), under such conditions as may be prescribed in such regulation, a requirement of such State or political subdivision applicable to a dietary supplement if-- ``(A) such requirement is more stringent than the applicable requirement under Federal law; or ``(B)(i) such requirement addresses a compelling local condition; and ``(ii) compliance with such requirement does not render the dietary supplement out of compliance with Federal law.''. <all>
Plain-language analysis
Not yet analyzed.
A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.