Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 7366

Introduced

Dietary Supplement Regulatory Uniformity Act

Sponsor
RNicholas A. Langworthy· New York
Introduced
February 4, 2026
Policy area
Health
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.February 4, 2026
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7366 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 7366

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to clarify and affirm 
the preemptive authority of the Food and Drug Administration over 
dietary supplement regulation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 4, 2026

Mr. Langworthy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to clarify and affirm 
the preemptive authority of the Food and Drug Administration over 
dietary supplement regulation, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Dietary Supplement Regulatory 
Uniformity Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF FEDERAL PREEMPTION WITH RESPECT TO DIETARY 
SUPPLEMENT REGULATION.

Section 403A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
343-1) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(c)(1) No State (or political subdivision thereof) may establish 
or continue in effect any requirement concerning a dietary supplement 
which is different from, or in addition to, or that is not otherwise 
identical with, a requirement applicable to a dietary supplement under 
this Act.
``(2) Upon application of a State or a political subdivision 
thereof, the Secretary may, by regulation and after notice and 
opportunity for a hearing, exempt from paragraph (1), under such 
conditions as may be prescribed in such regulation, a requirement of 
such State or political subdivision applicable to a dietary supplement 
if--
``(A) such requirement is more stringent than the 
applicable requirement under Federal law; or
``(B)(i) such requirement addresses a compelling local 
condition; and
``(ii) compliance with such requirement does not render the 
dietary supplement out of compliance with Federal law.''.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →