Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 8584

Introduced

Indo-Pacific Space Partnership Act of 2026

Sponsor
DDave Min· California
Introduced
April 29, 2026
Policy area
International Affairs
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.April 29, 2026
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8584 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 8584

To require the Commander of the United States Space Command to submit a 
feasibility report on expanding the Multinational Force Operation 
Olympic Defender.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 29, 2026

Mr. Min (for himself and Mr. Hill of Arkansas) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To require the Commander of the United States Space Command to submit a 
feasibility report on expanding the Multinational Force Operation 
Olympic Defender.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Indo-Pacific Space Partnership Act 
of 2026''.

SEC. 2. FEASIBILITY REPORT ON EXPANDING MULTINATIONAL FORCE OPERATION 
OLYMPIC DEFENDER.

(a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Commander of the United States Space Command 
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the 
feasibility and advisability of expanding the Multinational Force 
Operation Olympic Defender to include additional allies in the Indo-
Pacific region, including Japan and the Republic of Korea.
(b) Elements.--The report required by subsection (a) shall include 
the following:
(1) A description of current activities and initiatives to 
facilitate the expansion of the Multinational Force Operation 
Olympic Defender to allied countries in the Indo-Pacific 
region, including Japan and the Republic of Korea.
(2) An identification of any policy change the Government 
of Japan, the Government of the Republic of Korea, and the 
government of any other allied country in the Indo-Pacific 
region identified by the Commander of the United States Space 
Command would need to make in order for the United States to 
extend a formal invitation for such countries to join the 
Multinational Force Operation Olympic Defender.
(3) An identification of any funding or policy change 
necessary to facilitate the accession to the Multinational 
Force Operation Olympic Defender of Japan, the Republic of 
Korea, and any other allied country in the Indo-Pacific region 
identified by the Commander of the United States Space Command.
(4) An assessment of each of the following:
(A) The manner in which the accession to the 
Multinational Force Operation Olympic Defender of 
Japan, the Republic of Korea, and any other allied 
country in the Indo-Pacific region identified by the 
Commander of the United States Space Command would 
affect United States national security interests.
(B) Whether the accession to the Multinational 
Force Operation Olympic Defender of Japan and the 
Republic of Korea--
(i) is feasible; and
(ii) would be in the national interest of 
the United States.
(C) The additional resources or authorities needed 
from the executive and legislative branches to carry 
out the accession to the Multinational Force Operation 
Olympic Defender of Japan and the Republic of Korea.
(c) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.--In this section, 
the term ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →