Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · House

H.R. 9262

Introduced

Local Control Protection Act

Sponsor
RRobert P. Bresnahan, Jr.· Pennsylvania
Introduced
June 11, 2026
Policy area
Taxation
Latest action
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.June 11, 2026
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 9262 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 9262

To protect the authority of local governments to make zoning decisions 
regarding data center development, and to require community benefit 
agreements as a condition for Federal tax incentives.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 11, 2026

Mr. Bresnahan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the 
Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

A BILL

To protect the authority of local governments to make zoning decisions 
regarding data center development, and to require community benefit 
agreements as a condition for Federal tax incentives.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Local Control Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.

A court of the United States shall not have jurisdiction to hear 
any challenge to the determination of a unit of local government to 
preclude the development of a covered data center, if the determination 
was made by a recorded vote along with documented findings.

SEC. 3. FEDERAL AGENCY ACTION PROHIBITION.

No Federal agency may approve permits related to the construction 
or operation of a covered data center if the owner, operator, or 
developer of such covered data center has initiated or is maintaining a 
legal action in any court seeking to challenge, overturn, or otherwise 
override a zoning denial issued by a unit of local government with 
respect to that covered data center, if the determination was made by a 
recorded vote along with documented findings.

SEC. 4. COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENT FOR TAX CREDIT ELIGIBILITY.

(a) In General.--Part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of subtitle A 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subpart:

``Subpart H--Community Benefit Requirement for Credits for Data Centers

``SEC. 54. COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENT FOR CREDITS FOR DATA CENTERS.

``(a) In General.--No credit against the tax imposed by this 
chapter for any taxable year shall be allowed under this part to a 
taxpayer developing a covered data center (as defined in section 5 of 
the Local Control Protection Act) during such taxable year if such 
taxpayer does not include on their return of tax for such taxable year 
and make publicly available an executed legally enforceable agreement 
with the chief executive of the unit of local government in which the 
covered data center will be developed that includes terms related to 
local tax liabilities, infrastructure mitigation measures addressing 
road, water, stormwater, and utility impacts, environmental and noise 
monitoring protocols, and that is accompanied by a Local Workforce 
Utilization Plan that--
``(1) documents the good-faith efforts of the developer to 
recruit and hire workers from the region in which the covered 
data center is located before sourcing labor from outside the 
region;
``(2) identifies partnerships with registered 
apprenticeship programs, career and technical education 
centers, community colleges, and local workforce development 
organizations serving the region; and
``(3) demonstrates a preference for local contractors and 
subcontractors whenever qualified local firms are available.
The Local Workforce Utilization Plan shall be publicly filed as part of 
the agreement required under this subsection and shall be updated 
annually for the duration of the construction period.
``(b) Related Party.--All persons which are treated as a single 
employer under subsections (a) and (b) of section 52 shall be treated 
as a single taxpayer for purposes of this section.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of subparts for part IV of 
subchapter A of chapter 1 of subtitle A of such Code is amended by 
adding at the end the following new item:

subpart h. community benefit requirement for credits for data centers.

(c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 5. DEFINITION.

In this Act, the term ``covered data center'' means--
(1) a data center (as defined in section 453(a) of the 
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 
17112(a))) with a power demand of 20 megawatts or more; or
(2) any group of facilities--
(A) under common ownership or control;
(B) the majority of which primarily contain 
electronic equipment used to process, store, and 
transmit digital information;
(C) located on a contiguous or proximate site 
within the same municipality or county; and
(D) that, in the aggregate, have a power demand of 
20 or more megawatts.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

AI analysis · 100% confidence

AI-generated breakdown of the bill text above, checked by an independent review pass before publishing. It is analysis, not the law itself — the verbatim text and official source are the record.

In plain terms

The Local Control Protection Act aims to give local governments the authority to make decisions about zoning for data centers. It prevents federal courts from overriding local zoning decisions if they are made through a recorded vote with documented findings. Additionally, it requires developers of certain data centers to enter into community benefit agreements to qualify for federal tax credits.

Hidden provisions

  • SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

    A court of the United States shall not have jurisdiction to hear any challenge to the determination of a unit of local government to preclude the development of a covered data center, if the determination was made by a recorded vote along with documented findings.

  • SEC. 4. COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENT FOR TAX CREDIT ELIGIBILITY

    No credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for any taxable year shall be allowed under this part to a taxpayer developing a covered data center... if such taxpayer does not include... an executed legally enforceable agreement with the chief executive of the unit of local government...

Questionable / off-intent provisions

No off-intent or questionable provisions were flagged.

Junk / unrelated provisions

No filler or unrelated riders were flagged.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →