Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Bills/119th Congress · Senate

S.J.Res. 83

Introduced

A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities that have not been authorized by Congress.

Sponsor
DAdam B. Schiff· California
Introduced
September 18, 2025
Policy area
International Affairs
Latest action
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 51. Record Vote Number: 555.October 8, 2025
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 83 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. J. RES. 83

To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities 
that have not been authorized by Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

September 18 (legislative day, September 16), 2025

Mr. Schiff (for himself and Mr. Kaine) introduced the following joint 
resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

JOINT RESOLUTION

To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities 
that have not been authorized by Congress.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Congress has the sole power to declare war under 
Article I, section 8, clause 11 of the United States 
Constitution.
(2) Congress has not declared war upon, nor enacted a 
specific statutory authorization for use of military force 
against--
(A) any organization designated on or after 
February 20, 2025, as a foreign terrorist organization 
pursuant to section 219(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)) or as a specially 
designated global terrorist pursuant to Executive Order 
13224 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; relating to blocking 
property and prohibiting transactions with persons who 
commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism);
(B) any states in which those entities operate; or
(C) any non-state organization engaged in the 
promotion, trafficking, and distribution of illegal 
drugs and other related activities.
(3) The designation of an entity as a foreign terrorist 
organization or specially designated global terrorist provides 
no legal authority for the President to use force against 
members of designated organizations or any foreign state.
(4) There has been no armed attack on the United States 
by--
(A) any organization designated on or after 
February 20, 2025, as a foreign terrorist organization 
or specially designated global terrorist;
(B) any states in which those entities operate; or
(C) any non-state organization engaged in the 
promotion, trafficking, and distribution of illegal 
drugs and other related activities.
(5) The United States military strike on a vessel on 
September 2, 2025, and the subsequent United States military 
strike on a vessel on September 15, 2025, constitute, within 
the meaning of section 4(a) of the War Powers Resolution (50 
U.S.C. 1543(a)), either hostilities or a situation where 
imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the 
circumstances into which United States Armed Forces have been 
introduced. The application of the War Powers Resolution is 
without prejudice as to whether the strikes themselves violated 
United States domestic law, international humanitarian law, or 
international human rights law.
(6) Congress has not received sufficient information 
regarding--
(A) the vessels' passengers, cargo, or affiliation;
(B) the vessels' intended destinations;
(C) any threats the vessels posed to United States 
interests;
(D) any justification for the use of lethal force 
against the vessels;
(E) the availability of non-lethal means to 
interdict the vessels; or
(F) the purported domestic authority or 
international legal basis to conduct the strikes.
(7) Section 1013 of the Department of State Authorization 
Act, Fiscal Years 1984 and 1985 (50 U.S.C. 1546a), provides 
that any joint resolution or bill to require the removal of 
United States Armed Forces engaged in hostilities without a 
declaration of war or specific statutory authorization shall be 
considered in accordance with the expedited procedures of 
section 601(b) of the International Security and Arms Control 
Export Act of 1976.
(8) Congress is resolved to provide resources and 
authorities to the executive branch to prevent and mitigate 
drug and narcotics trafficking into the United States, 
including through the use of intelligence, law enforcement, 
personnel, and detection technology at and between ports of 
entry and diplomatic and military tools as appropriate to 
deter, prevent, and prosecute illicit drug and narcotics 
trafficking, and will consider providing additional resources 
and authorities if they are requested by the President to 
combat the spread of illegal drugs.
(9) On September 4, 2025, the President formally notified 
Congress of the September 2, 2025, strike, noted the potential 
for further military strikes, and stated that ``it is not 
possible at this time to know the full scope and duration of 
military operations that will be necessary'' to address the 
continuing threat of drug trafficking emanating from 
unspecified countries by unspecified organizations.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF USE OF ARMED FORCES.

(a) Termination.--Pursuant to section 1013 of the Department of 
State Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1984 and 1985 (50 U.S.C. 1546a) 
and in accordance with the provisions of section 601(b) of the 
International Security Assistance and Arms Export Control Act of 1976, 
Congress hereby directs the President to terminate the use of United 
States Armed Forces for hostilities against any organization designated 
on or after February 20, 2025, as a foreign terrorist organization or 
specially designated global terrorist, any states in which those 
entities operate, or any non-state organization engaged in the 
promotion, trafficking, and distribution of illegal drugs and other 
related activities, unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of 
war or specific authorization for use of military force.
(b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed as preventing the United States from defending itself from an 
armed attack or threat of an imminent armed attack or using the United 
States Armed Forces in support of civil authorities as part of 
authorized counternarcotics operations. The trafficking of illegal 
drugs does not itself constitute such an armed attack or threat of an 
imminent armed attack.
<all>

Plain-language analysis

Not yet analyzed.

A plain-language breakdown — including any hidden or off-intent provisions and whether the bill was fast-tracked — is generated separately and reviewed before publishing. It will appear here once ready. Until then, the verbatim text above and the official source are the record.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →