Compare politicians
Pick a politician on the left; the right fills in with their opponent — swap it for anyone. We compare their record and what they've declared, never their party.
Politician
DemocratBale Dalton
Unknown Office · Florida · Democrat
Compared with
RepublicanCory Mills
U.S. Representative · Florida · Republican
- Office
- Unknown Office
- District
- Florida
- State
- Florida
Promise scorecard · 0 tracked
No promises have been rated yet. Lifecycle promises (in progress, not yet rated) are not scored.
Integrity Score: signed average of per-rating credit × 100, weighted by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is reported separately from popularity. Methodology is open.
- Office
- U.S. Representative
- District
- Florida's 7th district
- State
- Florida
Promise scorecard · 0 tracked
No promises have been rated yet. Lifecycle promises (in progress, not yet rated) are not scored.
Integrity Score: signed average of per-rating credit × 100, weighted by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is reported separately from popularity. Methodology is open.
By the record
Sourced Layer-1 facts — what each official has actually done in office. Neutral: figures stand on their own, never scored against each other.
| Bale Dalton | Cory Mills | |
|---|---|---|
| Roll-call votes cast | — | 609 |
| Voted Yea / Nay | — | 459 / 137 |
| Votes against own party | — | 6% |
| Bills sponsored (118th–119th) | — | 45 |
| Of those, became law | — | 1 |
| Raised (latest cycle) | — | $805K |
Sources: Voteview (votes), Congress.gov (bills), FEC (finance). Independence = share of party-line votes cast against the member’s own party majority.
Where they stand — declared issues
Issues where both have a stated position or a tracked promise, shown side by side. These are their own claims — judged separately from whether they kept them.
No shared declared issues yet.
Bale Dalton and Cory Mills don’t yet have any topic in common on which both have a stated position or a tracked promise — so there’s nothing to compare issue-by-issue here. That usually just means coverage is still thin. You can help add their sourced positions and promises.