Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
PartialEconomy, Taxes & Inflation

It's long past time the wealthiest people and the biggest corporations in this country paid their fair share. We don't need a tax code that rewards wealth more than it rewards work.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

PartialFact-checker reviewConfidence: 80%

Independently verified. As President, Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (Aug 16, 2022), which enacted concrete corporate 'fair share' measures: a 15% corporate minimum tax on companies with over $1B in book income (projected ~$222B), a 1% stock-buyback excise tax (~$74B), and ~$80B in additional IRS enforcement funding aimed at wealthy tax dodgers -- all confirmed by multiple independent tax-law sources. However, the wealthiest-individuals half of the promise never landed: his repeated proposals for a 25% billionaire minimum tax on unrealized gains and a 28% corporate rate remained only budget requests Congress never passed (confirmed by ITEP, CNBC, and the archived White House fact sheet, which describes these as proposals), and the preferential capital-gains treatment plus most 2017 individual tax cuts stayed in place, so the 'tax code that rewards wealth more than work' was not structurally changed. A real portion was enacted while the rest failed -- textbook PARTIAL. The same standard applied to a politician of either party who enacted the corporate piece but failed the individual piece would yield PARTIAL. The prior rating's outcome, confidence, and primary source all check out; the White House archive URL is live and its quotes are accurate.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →