“Provide a $15,000 first-time home-buyer tax credit to expanding affordable housing.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently re-verified. All three cited sources are real, live, and support the outcome. (1) The Whitehouse Senate press release (whitehouse.senate.gov, Mar 13 2024) is genuine and confirms a refundable credit 'worth up to 10 percent of a home's purchase price - up to a maximum of $15,000' for first-time homebuyers, the amount Biden promised in 2020. (2) CBS News confirms Biden 'proposed a new tax credit that would provide $10,000 to first-time home buyers' in his 2024 State of the Union. (3) Multiple sources (The Mortgage Reports, congress.gov H.R.2863) confirm the First-Time Homebuyer Act was introduced by allied Democrats (Blumenauer/Whitehouse/Heinrich/Panetta), never advanced past committee, and was not enacted through the end of Biden's term. Biden's conduct exceeds a single supporting vote: he made the credit a 2020 campaign centerpiece, his administration backed the $15,000 First-Time Homebuyer Act, he included a homebuyer tax credit as a line item in his FY2025 budget, and he dedicated his March 2024 SOTU to demanding Congress pass it. That is active, sustained executive leadership of the effort that did not land -> CHAMPIONED, not ATTEMPTED (more than a single advance) and not PARTIAL/FULL (nothing was ever enacted; no credit exists). Confidence held at 0.7 rather than higher because Biden's own concrete presidential proposal downgraded the promised $15,000 to a $10,000 credit ($5,000/year for two years), a real erosion of the specific promise, and the effort ultimately failed to pass. This label would be applied identically to an opposite-party president with the same record of high-profile budget-and-SOTU advocacy for a reduced version that never became law.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.