“Expand and use the power of the U.S. Justice Department to address systemic misconduct in police departments and prosecutors' offices.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Biden's Justice Department used its pattern-or-practice authority extensively against police departments: it rescinded a Trump-era memo restricting consent decrees (April 2021), opened investigations including Minneapolis (April 21, 2021), Louisville, Phoenix and Memphis, issued formal findings of unconstitutional practices, and reached consent-decree agreements with Louisville (December 2024) and Minneapolis (approved Jan. 6, 2025) before the term ended. The promise's second element - prosecutors' offices - saw no comparable DOJ action, and the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, which would have expanded DOJ tools, passed the House but stalled in the Senate in 2021. Substantial delivery on police departments with no action on prosecutors' offices supports partial credit; the successor administration's dismissal of the decrees after Jan. 20, 2025 does not affect this completed-term assessment.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.