“decriminalize the use of cannabis and automatically expunge all prior cannabis use convictions”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently re-verified. All three cited sources are real, live, and accurately quoted: the archived White House proclamation (Dec 22, 2023) grants a full pardon for 'simple possession of marijuana, attempted simple possession of marijuana, or use of marijuana'; FactCheck.org confirms 'the pardon does not expunge a conviction' and that it 'only applies to federal charges and convictions, including violations of D.C. criminal code' (no state cases); and MPP documents the May 2024 DEA proposed rule to move cannabis to Schedule III. An independent adjudicator, PolitiFact's Biden Promise Tracker, rates this exact promise 'Compromise' (the direct analog of PARTIAL) and notes the rescheduling process stalled awaiting DOJ review and was never finalized. Neither promised outcome was fully delivered: cannabis was NOT decriminalized (rescheduling to Schedule III is not decriminalization, and even that was only proposed, not finalized), and convictions were NOT automatically expunged (pardons explicitly do not clear records) and reach only federal/DC cases, not the state convictions that are the vast majority. But Biden personally issued real mass-pardon relief affecting thousands and directed the scheduling review, so this is a genuine partial keep, not a mere attempt. PARTIAL is nonpartisan-fair: a politician of either party with an identical record (mass pardons for a class, an unfinished scheduling review, no decriminalization or expungement) would earn the same 'kept some, not all' label.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.