Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Fully KeptCriminal Justice, Policing & Public Safety

expand the Justice Department's use of pattern-or-practice investigations and consent decrees to address unlawful policing

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

Fully KeptFact-checker reviewConfidence: 85%

The Biden Justice Department demonstrably expanded pattern-or-practice enforcement: after Attorney General Garland rescinded 2018 limits on consent decrees in April 2021, DOJ opened investigations into at least eight law-enforcement agencies - including Minneapolis, Louisville, Phoenix, Memphis, Trenton, Mount Vernon, Oklahoma City, and the Louisiana State Police - issued formal findings in several, and negotiated consent decrees with Louisville (December 12, 2024) and Minneapolis (approved January 6, 2025). This is the expansion the promise described. The successor administration moved to dismiss the decrees and close the remaining investigations in May 2025, after Biden's term ended on January 20, 2025, which does not change the term-period assessment.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →