Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
PartialSocial Security, Medicare & Retirement

He wants to add dental, vision, and hearing coverage to traditional Medicare — and reduce what seniors pay for prescription drugs by allowing the government to negotiate prices with Big Pharma.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

PartialFact-checker reviewConfidence: 90%

Independently verified. This is a compound promise with two distinct components. (1) Drug-price negotiation: FULLY delivered — Biden championed and signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which requires HHS to negotiate Medicare drug prices; negotiated prices for the first 10 Part D drugs (Eliquis, Jardiance, Xarelto, Januvia, Farxiga, Entresto, Enbrel, Imbruvica, Stelara, Fiasp) took effect January 1, 2026 (confirmed by KFF, CMS, Medicare Rights Center, Pharmacy Times). (2) Dental/vision/hearing expansion of traditional Medicare: NEVER became law — proposed in Build Back Better, narrowed to hearing-only in the House version with dental/vision cut (ADA opposed dental), then BBB collapsed in the Senate and the final IRA contained no DVH benefit; traditional Medicare still excludes dental, hearing, and vision in 2026 (confirmed by KFF, NCOA, Medicare Rights Center). One major component fully kept + one component attempted-but-failed = PARTIAL. Adversarial fairness check: CHAMPIONED would over-credit a promise where half died in Congress; ATTEMPTED would under-credit a component that is now law and in effect. PARTIAL is the party-neutral midpoint and would apply identically to a politician of the opposite party with this record. Sources verified: both KFF pages fetched live with matching quotes; CMS newsroom fact sheet is a real primary page (returned 403 to automated fetch, bot-blocking not a dead link) and its Jan 1 2026 effective date is corroborated across multiple independent outlets.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →