Independently re-verified. Biden's 2020 campaign proposal was to lower the Medicare eligibility age to 60. As president he had unified Democratic control in 2021-2022 and full agenda-setting power. His FY2022 budget request (May 2021) did contain a token, unfunded line offering people 60-64 the option to enroll in Medicare with financing separate from the trust fund, but it included no specifics and no cost estimate. The decisive facts point to non-pursuit: he deliberately LEFT the age reduction OUT of his signature American Families Plan (the actual legislative vehicle) despite 80+ House Democrats and 17 senators publicly urging him to include it; it was then dropped from Build Back Better and never appeared in the Inflation Reduction Act; his FY2023/FY2024 budgets shifted to Medicare solvency, drug-price negotiation, and out-of-pocket caps rather than the eligibility age; and the age remained 65 through the end of his term. The only real legislative push (Jayapal's Sept 2021 bill, 130+ lawmakers) came from Congress, not the White House, and made no headway. This is a genuine opportunity that he chose not to prioritize. The verdict is a REVISE only to correct the prior rationale's overstated 'never engaged' claim (the FY2022 budget mention existed), acknowledge it, and lower confidence to reflect a real IGNORED/ATTEMPTED boundary; the symbolic, unfunded budget line does not rise to genuine advancement (ATTEMPTED), and the affirmative exclusion from his own signature bill against his party's wishes keeps this at IGNORED under a party-neutral standard. Same standard would apply to either party: a one-time unfunded budget placeholder plus deliberate omission from the real bill = IGNORED, not a positive score.