“Joe Biden has outlined his commitment to protecting and expanding reproductive freedom by vowing to work to safeguard Roe v. Wade, only appoint judges who will respect Roe, support the repeal of the Hyde Amendment, and use executive action to protect and expand access to abortion and contraception.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently re-verified all three cited sources: they are real, live, and accurately quoted. This is a compound promise (safeguard Roe, appoint only pro-Roe judges, support Hyde repeal, use executive action). Biden actively LED across every presidential lever rather than merely casting a supporting vote: (1) removed the Hyde Amendment from his FY2022 budget for the first time in decades (NPR, Washington Post, Planned Parenthood confirm), (2) appointed Ketanji Brown Jackson (confirmed 53-47, sworn June 30, 2022) plus a record number of pro-choice-leaning judges, (3) publicly pushed codification via the Women's Health Protection Act, which he championed but which was filibustered 49-51 in the Senate on May 11, 2022 (Congress.gov, Senate roll call vote 117-2-65, NPR/CBS confirm), and (4) after Dobbs signed EO 14076 (July 8, 2022) and EO 14079 (Aug 3, 2022) protecting abortion, contraception, medication abortion, patient privacy and travel (verified on bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov and the American Presidency Project). The components he directly controlled (budget, executive orders, judicial nominations, advocacy) he delivered; the components that failed (Roe not safeguarded, WHPA not codified, Hyde still in appropriations) were blocked by the Supreme Court and the Senate filibuster, outside his direct control. Not FULL because the overarching aim was not enacted, but he drove rather than merely supported the effort. Party-neutral standard: a Republican president who used budget, EOs, judicial appointments, and public advocacy to drive a promised policy, even where ultimate legislative/judicial outcomes went against him, would equally rate CHAMPIONED. Confidence 0.85 is appropriate given abundant primary evidence balanced against the compound promise's failed ultimate outcome.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.