“We commit to providing Section 8 housing support for every eligible family, and will enact protections to keep landlords from discriminating against voucher recipients.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Adversarial re-check verified all three cited sources are real, live, and support the outcome. As president Biden actively drove the largest housing-voucher expansion requests in program history (FY23 budget sought $32.1B to extend assistance to ~200,000 more households, described as the most significant voucher expansion ever), and Congress funded real net new vouchers across FY2022-2024 (roughly 25,000 + 11,700 + 3,000 ≈ 39,700 households; HUD called one FY22 round of 19,000+ vouchers the most expansive allocation in 20 years). This is concrete, delivered partial fulfillment that exceeds a mere ATTEMPTED. However the promise's core commitments went unmet: about 18 million eligible low-income households (roughly three-quarters of eligible renters) still received no assistance, so support was never provided to 'every eligible family,' and no federal source-of-income anti-discrimination protection for voucher holders was enacted (there is no general federal voucher non-discrimination law). Real but far-from-complete delivery on the voucher-support half plus nothing on the anti-discrimination half fits PARTIAL. Party-neutral test: the same record for either party would earn PARTIAL for the real, funded expansion. Note it sits at the lenient edge - PolitiFact rated the underlying promise 'Promise Broken' and the anti-discrimination component saw zero federal enactment - so confidence is trimmed from 0.78 to 0.74 to reflect the PARTIAL/ATTEMPTED boundary; outcome and sources confirmed.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.