“There are at least 2 million criminal aliens now inside the country. We will begin moving them out day one, in joint operations with local, state and federal law enforcement.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified all three cited sources as real, live, and accurately quoted. Within the first week of taking office (Jan 25, 2017, day 5), Trump signed Executive Order 13768, which reinstated the Secure Communities program and directed expansion of section 287(g) agreements deputizing state and local police as immigration officers -- exactly the 'joint operations with local, state and federal law enforcement' promised. ICE interior arrests rose 30% in FY2017 (143,470 total, per Pew), and 74% of FY2017 arrests were of immigrants with prior criminal convictions, aligning with the criminal-alien focus of the promise. This is active leadership/driving of the promised effort via executive action, so CHAMPIONED (+0.75) rather than a single supporting vote. It is not FULL because the implied 2-million scale of removals was never achieved, total removals stayed below Obama-era peaks, and parts of the order (sanctuary-jurisdiction funding) were enjoined. A president of either party with this identical first-week executive record would earn the same label under a neutral standard. Confidence 0.85 reflects strong sourcing with the only residual uncertainty being the FULL-vs-CHAMPIONED line on a 'begin day one' promise.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.