Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
PartialImmigration & Border Security

Fully funds the construction of a wall on our southern border with the full understanding that the country Mexico will be reimbursing the United States for the full cost of such wall. [End Illegal Immigration Act] — 2-year mandatory minimum federal prison sentence for illegally re-entering the U.S. after a previous deportation; 5-year mandatory minimum for those with felony convictions, multiple misdemeanor convictions or two or more prior deportations.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

PartialFact-checker reviewConfidence: 80%

Congress declined to fully fund the wall during the first term; roughly 450 miles were built by January 2021 using appropriations plus diverted military funds, and Mexico never reimbursed any costs. In the second term, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (signed July 4, 2025) appropriated more than $46.5 billion for border wall construction, delivering the funding component late and through U.S. taxpayers rather than Mexican reimbursement. The promised mandatory-minimum prison sentences for illegal reentry were never enacted: the closest measure, Kate's Law (H.R. 3004), which revised reentry penalties, passed the House on June 29, 2017 but was never taken up by the Senate. Funding delivered without the Mexico-reimbursement or sentencing components supports a partial rating.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →