“This is one of the worst deals ever made by any country in history. [The Iran deal] will lead to nuclear problems. All they have to do is sit back 10 years, and they don't have to do much.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
The 2016 statement is a condemnation of the JCPOA whose implied commitment was to undo/fix the deal. As President, Trump personally and unilaterally drove that effort: on May 8, 2018 he terminated U.S. participation in the JCPOA (confirmed by the Trump White House archive) and reimposed sanctions, launching the maximum-pressure campaign. That is decisive, self-directed, aligned action he LED. However, the prior FULL (+1.0, 0.95) overstates it: Trump's own 2016 promise, and the fuller implication of this quote (preventing Iran's nuclear problem via a better deal), was to RENEGOTIATE a better agreement. He never did. PolitiFact's Trumpometer rated the 'Renegotiate the Iran deal' promise PROMISE BROKEN because he withdrew instead of renegotiating and reached no replacement; Iran subsequently exceeded JCPOA enrichment limits. Under a party-neutral standard, a president who personally drove a signature action consistent with his condemnation of a deal, but did not deliver the promised better outcome, warrants CHAMPIONED (+0.75, actively led the effort, not fully enacted) rather than FULL (+1.0). Confidence reduced from 0.95 to 0.75 to reflect genuine interpretive ambiguity between the 'exit the deal' (fully done) and 'renegotiate a better deal' (broken) readings.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.