“We're getting rid of gun free zones, OK? I can tell you. We're getting rid of them. Bearing arms is the most basic human right of all. I will not let you down.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
The promise bundles a specific, checkable deliverable (getting rid of gun-free zones — Trump specified schools and military bases) with a broad pro-gun-rights principle ("bearing arms is the most basic human right"). On the specific deliverable, nothing was achieved: PolitiFact rated the schools/military-bases pledge "Promise Broken," noting scant progress, and the Gun-Free School Zones Act and DoD base policy remain in force. Trump's Feb 7, 2025 "Protecting Second Amendment Rights" executive order does not mention gun-free zones, and the 2026 wave of firearms deregulation (dealer-license enforcement, mental-illness/finance restrictions, stabilizing braces, private-sale/background-check rules) does not touch them either. However, those same executive actions concretely advance the promise's broader pro-gun-rights thrust — real delivery on the principle, not mere attempts. So the general principle is partly delivered through genuine executive action while the headline pledge to eliminate gun-free zones is unmet: a partial outcome. Confidence is moderate because a reasonable nonpartisan evaluator could instead read the unfulfilled specific pledge as ATTEMPTED, since none of the aligned actions chip away at gun-free zones themselves.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.