Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
PartialTrade & Tariffs

To me, the most beautiful word in the dictionary is tariff. It's my favorite word. It needs a public relations firm. We're going to be a tariff nation. It's not going to be a cost to you. It's going to be a cost to another country.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

PartialFact-checker reviewConfidence: 70%

The 'tariff nation' half was delivered: beginning April 5, 2025, Executive Order 14257 placed a 10% baseline duty on nearly all imports, alongside sector tariffs, and after the Supreme Court struck down the IEEPA tariffs on February 20, 2026 a successor 10% global duty under Section 122 took effect February 24, 2026. The 'not going to be a cost to you' half has not held: St. Louis Fed researchers found companies passed 35% of tariff costs to U.S. consumers from May through July 2025, and Goldman Sachs estimated consumers could ultimately bear as much as 55%, with U.S. importers legally paying the duties at the border. He kept the tariff expansion but the promised costlessness to Americans is contradicted by the available price evidence.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →