Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
No opportunityCriminal Justice, Policing & Public Safety

I will sign concealed carry reciprocity. Your Second Amendment does not end at the state line.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

No opportunityFact-checker reviewConfidence: 80%

The promise is specifically to SIGN concealed carry reciprocity legislation, an act that is conditional on Congress first passing a bill and sending it to the president's desk. Independently re-verified: the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act (H.R. 38) was reintroduced in Jan 2025, reported favorably out of the House Judiciary Committee on March 25, 2025 (18-9), and placed on the Union Calendar (#289) on Oct 3, 2025, but as of July 2026 it has NOT received a full House floor vote and the Senate has not acted, so no bill has ever reached Trump for signature. PolitiFact (Jan 29, 2025) confirms there has been no executive action by Trump on concealed carry reciprocity and that no such law has been signed; a president also cannot accomplish reciprocity by executive order (it requires legislation). Trump has repeatedly and publicly reaffirmed support and said his administration is 'working on' it, so he has neither ignored nor opposed the promise. Under a party-neutral standard, a president who pledged to sign a bill his own party's Congress has not yet passed to his desk warrants NO_OPPORTUNITY, not a penalty (IGNORED/ABSTAINED too harsh given ongoing advocacy; ATTEMPTED too generous given verbal support is not concrete advancement of a signature). Adversarial checks cleared: all three cited sources are real, live, and support the outcome; the undated 'Maryland Shall Issue passes the House' item refers to an older Congress and does not establish a 119th-Congress floor vote. Note: the prior rating's claim that PolitiFact rates the related promise 'In the Works' was not independently verified and is omitted here; it does not affect the outcome.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →