Adversarial re-check: all three sources the prior rater cited are real, live, and quoted accurately (Bipartisan Policy Center, CRFB, FactCheck.org — each independently re-fetched). The PARTIAL outcome survives, but the rationale is revised because the prior rating (a) missed an enacted Medicare eligibility cut that runs directly against the promise, and (b) asserted a '2.7% of the 75-year shortfall' figure that does not appear in the FactCheck.org piece it was attributed to. KEPT SIDE: no Social Security or Medicare benefit, eligibility, or COLA reduction has been enacted for the general beneficiary population, and Trump's FY2027 budget proposes none — Newsweek: 'The FY 2027 budget does not propose any reductions to Social Security benefits, eligibility rules, or cost-of-living adjustments' and 'The budget also does not propose cutting Medicare benefits or eligibility.' The ~$45B/yr Medicare sequestration that his own reconciliation law triggered under statutory PAYGO was averted when the November 2025 shutdown-ending funding law wiped the PAYGO scorecard (CRFB). OBBBA also reduced income taxation of benefits for many seniors. NOT-KEPT SIDE: the same law he drove and signed measurably weakened both programs. OBBBA sec. 71201 'restricts Medicare eligibility to U.S. citizens, green card holders, Cuban-Haitian entrants, and people residing under the Compacts of Free Association, eliminating Medicare eligibility for people not included in these groups, such as those with temporary protected status and refugees and asylees,' with coverage terminated no later than 18 months from enactment — CBO scores it at $5.1B less Medicare spending over ten years and 100,000 more uninsured (KFF). That is an enacted, signed Medicare eligibility cut, not a projection. Separately, the 2026 Trustees Report moved OASI depletion one year earlier, to 2032 — 'largely due to the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included multiple provisions that, together, lower tax liability for Social Security beneficiaries' (BPC) — implying an automatic 22% benefit cut at depletion absent action. He has advanced no solvency measure, instead claiming fraud removal alone can save the program; FactCheck.org puts recoverable fraud and administrative cost at about $10.2B/yr, 'equal to just 2.5 days' worth of benefits,' against a $25T 75-year gap. PARTY-NEUTRALITY TEST: applying the identical standard to an opposite-party officeholder — headline benefits preserved and a scheduled cut averted, but a signed law that terminates coverage for one enrollee class and pulls insolvency forward a year, with no solvency fix attempted — the same label follows. FULL is unavailable because of the enacted sec. 71201 termination and the accelerated depletion date; CHAMPIONED overstates the record given he signed the provisions that did the damage; MISALIGNED/HOSTILE overstates it in the other direction given no broad benefit, eligibility, or COLA cut and the averted sequester. Kept some but not all: PARTIAL. Confidence raised slightly from 0.70 to 0.75 on independent verification of every source, capped below 0.8 because 'protect' is a rhetorical, unquantified pledge.