Adversarial re-check: all three cited sources were independently fetched, are live, and carry the exact quotes attributed to them (no invented or misquoted source). Timeline verified: (1) On March 19, 2024 (WABC radio, reported by PBS NewsHour/AP March 20, 2024) Trump floated a national ~15-week limit in the promise's exact words. (2) On April 8, 2024 he released a Truth Social video abandoning any federal gestational limit -- PolitiFact quotes him: 'The states will determine by vote or legislation, or perhaps both. And whatever they decide must be the law of the land.' PolitiFact explicitly characterizes this as abandoning the federal-ban approach he had previously supported. (3) On October 1, 2024 (CBS News) he went further, posting that he 'would not support a federal abortion ban, under any circumstances, and would, in fact, veto it.' (4) Independently confirmed that no federal 15-week (or any) national gestational limit has been enacted; abortion regulation remains state-level, and nothing in the second term advances a 15-week federal standard. Outcome taxonomy check: this is more than IGNORED (-0.25), because he did not merely fail to engage -- he publicly reversed and committed to block the exact policy. It is not ABSTAINED (-0.5), because he took a clear position rather than avoiding one. It falls short of HOSTILE (-1.0) because no 15-week bill ever reached him and he took no concrete action (veto, whip effort) to kill one; the opposition is declaratory. MISALIGNED (-0.75) -- took a position/measures against the promise's direction -- is the correct fit. Cross-party fairness test: a politician of either party who floated a specific federal standard, repudiated it three weeks later in favor of leaving it to the states, then pledged to veto that standard 'under any circumstances,' would get MISALIGNED under this same rubric; the label is not driven by the underlying policy's partisan valence but by the documented reversal-plus-veto-pledge. Confidence held at 0.88 rather than higher because the underlying statement ('I'm thinking in terms of that') is a soft musing rather than a firm pledge, which leaves some legitimate room for a rater to score the reversal as IGNORED instead.