ADVERSARIAL RE-CHECK: All three sources cited by the prior researcher were independently fetched and confirmed REAL, live, and accurately quoted. (1) govinfo FR-2025-01-30/2025-02090 is genuinely EO 14168, signed January 20, 2025, 90 FR 8615-8618; Section 4(c) verbatim contains the quoted language about the Bureau of Prisons and 'no Federal funds ... for the purpose of conforming an inmate's appearance to that of the opposite sex,' and Section 4(a) contains the quoted 'males are not detained in women's prisons or housed in women's detention centers.' (2) The whitehouse.gov presidential-action page is live and carries the same text. (3) The PolitiFact check is real, dated October 18, 2024, rated 'Mostly True,' and confirms Harris's 2019 position on gender-affirming surgery for federal prisoners and immigration detainees. No invented or misquoted source found. I ALSO CLOSED THE GAP the prior researcher flagged as unverified (implementation/litigation status), which cuts BOTH ways and ends up supporting the same label. In Kingdom v. Trump, Judge Royce Lamberth issued a preliminary injunction (June 3-5, 2025, later certified as a class action) blocking BOP enforcement of EO 14168 as to gender-affirming hormone therapy and social accommodations. Critically, the ACLU's own release states the court order provides that 'The injunction does not require BOP to provide gender-affirming surgical care' - i.e., the surgical-funding bar that is the actual subject of this statement was NOT enjoined and remains operative. OUTCOME CHECK. The statement is an attack line on an opponent, not an explicit 'I will' pledge; its only fairly-readable commitment is that Trump would stop taxpayer-funded gender-transition surgery for prisoners and detained immigrants. Rating it requires that inference, which I applied and would apply identically to a Democrat's attack line followed by day-one executive action in the same direction. On that party-neutral standard the label is CHAMPIONED, not merely ATTEMPTED: Trump did not cast one supporting vote, he personally signed a day-one executive order directing the policy himself - textbook leading/driving the effort. NOT UPGRADED TO FULL for two verified reasons: (a) the funding prohibition in Section 4(c) reaches BOP 'inmates' only, while the statement's stated targets are 'illegal aliens that are in prison' - ICE detainees are covered by Section 4(a) housing but not by the medical-funding bar; and (b) Section 4 is under an active class-wide preliminary injunction with litigation ongoing, so it is not 'essentially 100% kept.' CHAMPIONED expressly covers leading an effort 'even if not fully enacted,' which is exactly this record. NOT DOWNGRADED either: he had the opportunity, acted first and unilaterally, and nothing in the record shows him abstaining or moving against the stated direction. Confidence held at 0.85 - evidence is strong and primary, with the residual uncertainty being interpretive (an attack line converted to an implied commitment) rather than evidentiary.