“Have the Senate debate and vote on changing its filibuster/Senate rules on or before January 17, 2022 (MLK Day) if Republicans continued to block voting-rights legislation.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources are genuine and their quotes/headlines are accurate, and together they document the rated outcome. CBS News (fetched directly, HTTP 200) confirms the load-bearing quote verbatim — Schumer "brought up a vote on a rules change to move the legislation forward with a one-time exemption, which was fiercely opposed by Republicans and two members of his own party, Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema" — and confirms the vote occurred January 19, 2022 and failed. The Washington Post and NBC News URLs returned HTTP 403 on direct WebFetch (bot/paywall blocking), but WebSearch confirmed both cited headlines exist verbatim at the exact cited URLs and are not fabricated. Search results also surfaced Schumer's Jan 3 letter language ("on or before January 17, Martin Luther King Jr. Day"), corroborating the promise's exact deadline. The evidence supports CHAMPIONED: Schumer personally drove the rules-change vote to the floor as Majority Leader, and it failed 52-48 with Manchin and Sinema joining all 50 Republicans. The one deviation from FULL — the vote landing January 19, two days past the January 17 (MLK Day) deadline — is accurately reflected and not overstated.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.