Adversarial re-check: all three cited sources were independently fetched and are real, live, and accurately quoted. The Senate's own roll call record (Vote 190) confirms a recorded floor vote on June 5, 2024, 3:33 PM, Measure Number S. 4381 ('A bill to protect an individual's ability to access contraceptives...'), question 'On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed', result 'Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected', 51 YEA / 39 NAY / 10 not voting. Schumer's June 4, 2024 floor remarks on democrats.senate.gov confirm he scheduled it ('Tomorrow, the Senate will defend the freedom of choice with a vote on the Right to Contraception Act'). CBS News (Kaia Hubbard, updated June 5, 2024) independently confirms the 51-39 tally, the 60-vote threshold, that only two Republicans (Collins, Murkowski per the roll call) joined, and that Schumer scheduled and advocated the vote. The promised deliverable was PROCEDURAL — hold a floor vote — and it is the one thing entirely within a Majority Leader's control. He delivered it in full; the bill's failure to advance is attributable to the 60-vote cloture threshold and minority opposition, not to any failure to schedule. Two adversarial objections were tested and rejected: (1) 'cloture on the motion to proceed is not a vote on the Act' — the Senate's own record files this roll call under Measure Number S. 4381, it is a recorded floor vote on the measure, and a stricter reading would make any scheduling promise unkeepable whenever the minority filibusters, a standard I would not apply to a Republican leader either; (2) 'Schumer voted Nay, so this is MISALIGNED' — the roll call does confirm Schumer voted Nay, but the promise was to hold the vote, not to cast a particular vote, and a leader voting on the prevailing side of a failed cloture vote is the routine maneuver that preserves the right to move to reconsider (standard Senate practice; I did not locate a source expressly documenting his intent, so this is stated as practice, not as a verified motive). CHAMPIONED (+0.75) would understate the record because the promised act fully landed; ATTEMPTED is wrong because the vote itself was not merely attempted, it occurred. Same-standard test: a Republican leader who filed cloture, brought a bill to the floor, and saw it blocked 51-39 would likewise be credited FULL on a promise to 'hold a vote.' Prior rating stands; confidence trimmed marginally from 0.95 to 0.94 only to reflect the residual cloture-versus-passage interpretive ambiguity and the fact that corroboration was limited to direct source fetches (session web-search budget was exhausted).