Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
ChampionedVeterans / toxic exposure

Bring the Honoring Our PACT Act (health care for veterans exposed to burn pits and toxins) to a Senate vote and pass it.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

ChampionedFact-checker reviewConfidence: 95%

Three of the four cited sources are PRIMARY, reachable, and support the CHAMPIONED outcome with verbatim-accurate quotes. (1) The official Senate Roll Call Vote 280 confirms the Senate passed the Motion to Concur in the House Amendment to S.3373 (Honoring our PACT Act) 86-11 on Aug 2, 2022, with Schumer voting Yea — the bill came to a Senate vote and passed. (2) Schumer's floor remarks filing cloture confirm he acted as Majority Leader to drive the bill to the floor ("By filing cloture we should be able to pass this bipartisan piece of legislation before the week is done") — direct documentation of leadership beyond a mere vote, which is what distinguishes CHAMPIONED from a simple kept-by-voting outcome. (3) Schumer's statement on Senate passage is verified verbatim (though it is dated June 16, 2022, the earlier 84-14 Senate passage rather than the Aug 2 concurrence — still a valid championing statement, not undermining the rating). The outcome is not overstated: Schumer controls the floor calendar and personally filed cloture and advocated, which is documented championing. Confidence is 0.95 rather than higher because the one REPUTABLE_SECONDARY source (Washington Post) returned HTTP 403 and could not be independently verified, and source 3 corresponds to the first passage vote rather than the final concurrence — but neither is load-bearing given the fully verified roll-call and floor-remarks primary sources.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →