“Pass the Price Gouging Prevention Act to prohibit corporate price gouging and give federal and state enforcers stronger tools to stop it.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
CHAMPIONED is upheld. All three cited sources are reachable and support genuine, sustained LEADERSHIP by Warren on the Price Gouging Prevention Act, well beyond a single vote or generic support. Source 1 (warren.senate.gov) confirms verbatim the headline "Warren, Baldwin, Casey, Schakowsky Reintroduce Legislation to Crack Down on Price Gouging by Giant Corporations" and shows Warren authoring/leading the Feb 15, 2024 reintroduction (named first, featured quote). Source 2 (warren.senate.gov, Oct 11, 2024) contains the cited long quote verbatim and documents Warren renewing the push via FTC pressure during Hurricanes Helene and Milton — sustained advocacy. Source 3 (Quiver Quantitative) confirms Warren is the primary sponsor of S.2321 (Price Gouging Prevention Act of 2025), referred to the Commerce Committee on July 17, 2025, and NOT passed. I additionally verified via GovTrack/LegiScan that Warren is the sponsor of record ("Ms. Warren introduced the bill") for the promise-date bill S.3803 (118th Congress), which died in committee without a floor vote — confirming she is the author/lead, not merely one cosponsor. IMPORTANT CAVEAT (accurate): the Act has NOT become law — S.3803 was referred to committee, never got a floor vote, and died with the 118th Congress; S.2321 remains in committee. So the literal promise to "pass" the Act is unfulfilled, but as a minority-party senator Warren led/drove the effort as fully as her position allows across two Congresses, which meets the CHAMPIONED bar (leadership without enactment) rather than FULL or merely ATTEMPTED.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.