“As part of her 2020 presidential campaign's 'first 100 days' plan, pledged to rejoin the international climate agreement on day one and put the U.S. on a path to 100% net-zero emissions no later than 2050. (Made as a presidential candidate; conditional on winning the presidency.)”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Verified both cited sources against the adversarial bar. The promise was an explicitly conditional 2020 presidential-campaign pledge: a "first 100 days as president" plan to rejoin the international climate agreement on day one and put the U.S. on a path to 100% net-zero emissions by 2050. Every element required Klobuchar to first win the presidency. She suspended her presidential campaign on March 2, 2020 (before Super Tuesday) and endorsed Joe Biden, never winning the nomination or the presidency. Because the sole precondition for acting on this day-one/first-100-days pledge — being sworn in as president — never materialized, she never had a real chance to fulfill or break it. That is correctly NO_OPPORTUNITY, not IGNORED (never in a position to decline), ATTEMPTED (no presidential process existed to attempt), or MISALIGNED. Source verification: (1) CBS News — the exact quoted sentence appears verbatim in the article and supports the March 2, 2020 suspension and that she never became president; (2) NBC News — direct WebFetch returned HTTP 403 (anti-bot block), but a web search confirmed the cited quote is the article's genuine headline at the same URL (n1147191), so the quote is not fabricated. Both quotes are genuine and both sources document facts consistent with the NO_OPPORTUNITY outcome; the outcome does not overstate the evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.