“As part of her 2020 presidential campaign's 'first 100 days' plan, pledged to introduce gun-violence legislation including universal background checks, closing the gun-show loophole, and banning bump stocks, assault weapons, and high-capacity magazines. (Made as a presidential candidate; conditional on winning the presidency.)”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Rating upheld. The promise is explicitly a 2020 presidential campaign "first 100 days as president" gun-violence program (universal background checks, closing the gun-show loophole, banning bump stocks, assault weapons, and high-capacity magazines), and the promise text itself states it was conditional on winning the presidency. Verification of all three cited sources confirms the outcome: (1) Wikipedia reachable and the quote "On March 2, the day before Super Tuesday, Klobuchar announced that she was suspending her campaign" appears verbatim, establishing she exited the race the day before Super Tuesday and endorsed Biden; (2) the NBC News URL returned HTTP 403 to the automated fetch (bot-blocking, not a dead link) but web search independently confirms the exact cited URL and the verbatim headline "Amy Klobuchar drops out of presidential race, will endorse Biden," corroborated by Washington Post, CBS, and CNBC; (3) the Senate.gov page is reachable and the boyfriend-loophole quote appears verbatim, and it independently confirms the assault-weapons ban and high-capacity-magazine restrictions were NOT included in the 2022 law. Because Klobuchar never won the Democratic nomination or the presidency, the condition precedent for this presidential first-100-days agenda was never met and she never had a real chance to enact it; the bump-stock, assault-weapons, and high-capacity-magazine bans were never enacted. This is correctly NO_OPPORTUNITY (inability to act flows from losing the nomination, not from a choice to avoid the issue) rather than IGNORED or ABSTAINED, and the outcome does not overstate the evidence. The rationale's secondary point that she stayed aligned in her Senate role is supported by the Senate.gov source (boyfriend loophole / 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act); the additional S.42 and Feinstein co-sponsorship references are unsourced supporting color but are not load-bearing to the NO_OPPORTUNITY determination. The same conditional-on-winning standard would be applied to a candidate of either party who dropped out.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.