Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
No opportunityHealth care / Affordable Care Act

As part of her 2020 presidential campaign's 'first 100 days' plan, pledged to immediately suspend efforts to eliminate the Affordable Care Act's protections for people with pre-existing conditions. (Made as a presidential candidate; conditional on winning the presidency.)

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

No opportunityFact-checker reviewConfidence: 90%

Verified independently. The promise was an executive action in Klobuchar's June 2019 'first 100 days as president' plan, explicitly conditional on winning the presidency. The primary source (American Presidency Project archive of the campaign press release) is live and contains the exact pledge verbatim: 'Senator Klobuchar will immediately suspend all Trump Administration efforts — both in federal court and at the Department of Health and Human Services — that would allow insurance companies to deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.' This action is inherently presidential — only a sitting president can direct HHS or drop DOJ's federal-court ACA challenges; a senator cannot. Klobuchar suspended her campaign on March 2, 2020 (day before Super Tuesday) and endorsed Biden, confirmed by CNN, CNBC, and Ballotpedia. She never became president, so she never had a genuine opportunity to take (or act against) the promised presidential action. NO_OPPORTUNITY is the correct and party-neutral call: any candidate of any party who pledged a 'first 100 days as president' action and then exited the race before winning would receive the same label. Labeling this IGNORED or ABSTAINED would be unfair since the specific opportunity never arose.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →