“Introduced the Clean Competition Act to create a carbon border adjustment mechanism intended to lower carbon emissions while boosting U.S. manufacturers.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified. Congress.gov and GovInfo confirm Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) is the lead sponsor of S.4355 (117th Congress), the Clean Competition Act, introduced June 2022, which amends the Internal Revenue Code to create a carbon border adjustment based on carbon intensity, cosponsored by Coons, Schatz, and Heinrich. His Senate office press release (live) confirms the introduction and its stated purpose of boosting domestic manufacturers while cutting emissions. He did not merely introduce it once: he reintroduced it as S.3422 (118th Congress) with Rep. DelBene on Dec 6, 2023 (Senate press release and EPW committee release both live), sustaining and leading the effort. The bill has never been enacted, so this is not FULL, but Whitehouse authored, sponsored, reintroduced, and publicly advocated the measure — well beyond a single supporting vote — which is CHAMPIONED (+0.75). Fairness check: a legislator of any party who is the named lead sponsor introducing and reintroducing a signature bill across multiple Congresses would receive the same CHAMPIONED label; no partisan leniency detected. All three sources in the prior rating are real and accurately quoted. Confidence 0.9 retained.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.