“Introduced the Enhanced Energy Recovery Act to change the Section 45Q carbon-capture tax credit so captured carbon used for enhanced energy production receives the same tax treatment as carbon used for utilization or sequestration.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Verified. The promise (2024-09-25) was that Barrasso INTRODUCED the Enhanced Energy Recovery Act to change the Section 45Q carbon-capture tax credit so carbon used for enhanced energy production receives the same treatment as carbon used for utilization or sequestration. Both cited primary sources are reachable and support this. Barrasso's own Senate office release (title: "Barrasso Introduces Enhanced Energy Recovery Act"), dated September 25, 2024, confirms he introduced S.5212, joined by Lankford and Cassidy, and states the bill "would create parity under the Section 45Q carbon capture tax credit by giving across-the-board, equal treatment for carbon captured for increased energy production, utilization, and sequestration." The Cassidy office release confirms the same three senators and the mechanism: EOR/utilization is raised from $60 to $85/metric ton to match sequestration ($85). LEADERSHIP is confirmed for the CHAMPIONED rating: although Cassidy's press release lists Cassidy first in its headline, the authoritative legislative record (Congress.gov bill text, via search snippet since the page 403s to automated fetch) states "Mr. Barrasso introduced the bill along with co-sponsors Mr. Lankford and Mr. Cassidy" — i.e., Barrasso is the SPONSOR of record and Lankford/Cassidy are cosponsors. This is genuine authorship/lead-sponsorship, not merely a vote or supporting cosponsorship, so CHAMPIONED holds. The promise was to introduce the bill, which he fully accomplished; non-passage before the 118th Congress ended does not affect the promise, which did not include enactment. Minor note: the first cited quote paraphrases only the lead-in ("The legislation aims to" for "The Enhanced Energy Recovery Act (S. 5212) would") while the distinctive substance matches verbatim; the second cited quote is a faithful paraphrase whose material facts all appear on the page. I have normalized both to the verbatim on-page wording. Confidence is 0.93 rather than higher only because the definitive Congress.gov/GovTrack sponsor pages block automated fetch and were confirmed via search snippet rather than direct read.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.