“Introduce and advance federal legislation (the Protecting Pain-Capable Unborn Children from Late-Term Abortions Act) to ban abortion nationwide after 15 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for rape, incest, and the life/physical health of the mother.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Verification upholds the CHAMPIONED rating. The Graham official press release (PRIMARY) is reachable and its cited headline appears verbatim; the page confirms Graham introduced the exact named bill banning abortion nationwide after 15 weeks with exceptions for rape, incest, and the life/physical health of the mother. CBS News (REPUTABLE_SECONDARY) is reachable and all three cited quote fragments appear verbatim, confirming both the introduction/exceptions and that the bill was unlikely to get a vote under Democratic control. The congress.gov S.4840 record returned HTTP 403 to the automated fetcher (congress.gov's standard anti-bot block, not a dead or fabricated page); its existence, exact title, Graham sponsorship, and referral-to-committee-without-a-vote status were independently corroborated via web search, and the cited quote matches the actual page title. The outcome does not overstate the evidence: the introduce half is fully documented (lead sponsor, national press conference unveiling the bill), which is active leadership rather than a passive vote (CHAMPIONED); the advance half demonstrably did not occur (referred to Judiciary, no markup, no floor vote), consistent with the rating being CHAMPIONED rather than FULL and confidence held below 0.8 to reflect a defensible PARTIAL reading of the unfulfilled advancement.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.