“Reintroduce and pass the EARN IT Act to remove blanket Section 230 legal immunity from tech platforms for child sexual abuse material and let victims and families take legal action.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
The promise is compound — reintroduce AND pass the EARN IT Act. All three cited sources are reachable and support the PARTIAL rating. (1) The Senate Judiciary Committee press release (PRIMARY) confirms verbatim the quote "The EARN IT Act removes Section 230 blanket liability protection from service providers in the area of child sexual abuse material on their sites" and documents that Graham co-authored and reintroduced the bill on April 19, 2023 as Ranking Member. (2) Graham's own Senate office release (PRIMARY) confirms verbatim "I was very pleased the EARN IT Act, which I introduced along with Senator Blumenthal, unanimously passed the Senate Judiciary Committee," establishing genuine leadership and committee advancement. (3) Wikipedia (REPUTABLE_SECONDARY) confirms Graham introduced S.1207 on April 19, 2023 with 24 co-sponsors and that its status is "Died in Committee" — it never received a full Senate floor vote and never became law. Thus the reintroduction portion (with real leadership) was delivered while the central deliverable, passage, failed: Section 230 immunity was not removed and victims/families gained no new right to sue. This is correctly PARTIAL — not CHAMPIONED/KEPT (passage failed) and not ATTEMPTED (a concrete promised piece was delivered). The outcome does not overstate the evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.