All three cited primary sources are reachable and each documents the outcome for THIS promise, with the quoted text verified verbatim. (1) The Senate roll call (Vote 116, July 22, 2011) confirms Graham voted Nay on the Motion to Table the Motion to Proceed to H.R. 2560, the Cut, Cap, and Balance Act — i.e., he voted to advance the bill containing substantial cuts, statutory caps, and a BBA precondition; the motion to table was agreed to 51-46 over his objection. (2) Graham's op-ed "On the Debt Deal: Why I Voted No" is reachable and contains, verbatim, "I strongly supported Cut, Cap and Balance and will continue to work for passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution," confirming he voted against the debt-ceiling increase (Budget Control Act) consistent with the pledge's core commitment. (3) The press release documenting his signing of the Cut-Cap-Balance Pledge is reachable and contains, verbatim, the quoted statement about a constitutional balanced-budget requirement. The promise is an individual-conduct pledge: Graham signed it, voted to advance CCB, and voted No on the debt-limit increase that did not meet the pledge's conditions — every action the pledge asks of a single member was fulfilled. The BBA's non-passage and the debt-limit increase resulted from the majority tabling CCB and passing the BCA over his No vote, outside a lone senator's control. FULL rather than CHAMPIONED is correctly reasoned (supporter/cosponsor, not the effort's principal author). The evidence supports the outcome without overstatement.